134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23054325)
1. Simple preoperative parameters to assess technical difficulty during a radical perineal prostatectomy.
Horuz R; Göktaş C; Çetinel CA; Akça O; Cangüven Ö; Şahin C; Kafkaslı A; Albayrak S
Int Urol Nephrol; 2013 Feb; 45(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 23054325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.
Harris MJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17084506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical perineal prostatectomy: development of a new surgical technique that divides the dorsal vein complex.
Hiraoka Y; Shimizu Y; Abe H
Urol Int; 2004; 73(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15331893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
Janoff DM; Parra RO
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Institute of Urology, Peking University prostatectomy score: a simple preoperative classification of prostate cancer for predicting surgical difficulty and risk.
Ma BL; Yao L; Yu W; Wang Y; Song HF; Zhang ZN; Lu SM; Zhang Q; He ZS; Jin J; Zhou LQ
Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(6):581-586. PubMed ID: 30027927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radical perineal prostatectomy: a learning curve?
Eliya F; Kernen K; Gonzalez J; Peters K; Ibrahim I; Petzel K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 43(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 20882343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of a preoperatively estimated prostate volume using transrectal ultrasonography on surgical and oncological outcomes in a single surgeon's experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hirasawa Y; Ohno Y; Nakashima J; Shimodaira K; Hashimoto T; Gondo T; Ohori M; Tachibana M; Yoshioka K
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3702-8. PubMed ID: 26578435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy with high prostate volume.
Tugcu V; Simsek A; Yigitbasi I; Yenice MG; Sahin S; Tasci AI
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2018 Mar; 90(1):65-67. PubMed ID: 29633801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Goetzl MA; Krebill R; Griebling TL; Thrasher JB
Can J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(2):4553-7. PubMed ID: 19364427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era.
Garisto J; Bertolo R; Wilson CA; Kaouk J
World J Urol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):821-828. PubMed ID: 31811370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes and Complications According to Surgical Approach to Radical Prostatectomy: Special Focus on the Perineal Approach.
Song W; Park JH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Aug; 15(4):e645-e652. PubMed ID: 28216277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?
Lee HW; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1631-7. PubMed ID: 26539008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of prostate gland size on the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does size matter initially?
Martínez CH; Chalasani V; Lim D; Nott L; Al-Bareeq RJ; Wignall GR; Stitt L; Pautler SE
J Endourol; 2010 Feb; 24(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 20073551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and modified belt radical perineal prostatectomy for localized prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Lerner SE; Fleischmann J; Taub HC; Chamberlin JW; Kahan NZ; Melman A
Urology; 1994 Apr; 43(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 8154070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical prostatectomy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach.
Frazier HA; Robertson JE; Paulson DF
J Urol; 1992 Mar; 147(3 Pt 2):888-90. PubMed ID: 1538490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer.
Haab F; Boccon-Gibod L; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L; Toublanc M
Br J Urol; 1994 Nov; 74(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 7530127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The technique of radical perineal prostatectomy.
Scolieri MJ; Resnick MI
Urol Clin North Am; 2001 Aug; 28(3):521-33. PubMed ID: 11590811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
