133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23054325)
21. Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: a review of 95 cases.
Tuğcu V; Ekşi M; Sahin S; Çolakoğlu Y; Simsek A; Evren İ; İhsan Taşçı A
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):573-578. PubMed ID: 31984644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
Boris RS; Kaul SA; Sarle RC; Stricker HJ
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Stool behaviour and local pain after radical perineal and retroperitoneal prostatectomy].
Mirzapour K; de Geeter P; Löhmer H; Albers P
Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Nov; 42(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 22090372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of radical retropubic with perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer within the Uniformed Services Urology Research Group.
Lance RS; Freidrichs PA; Kane C; Powell CR; Pulos E; Moul JW; McLeod DG; Cornum RL; Brantley Thrasher J
BJU Int; 2001 Jan; 87(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 11121994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radical perineal prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in morbidly obese patients.
Dahm P; Yang BK; Salmen CR; Moul JW; Gan TJ
J Urol; 2005 Jul; 174(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 15947597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Anatomical dimensions using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging: impact on the learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Yao A; Iwamoto H; Masago T; Morizane S; Honda M; Sejima T; Takenaka A
Int J Urol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 25212691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perioperative and short-term outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy stratified by gland size.
Santok GD; Abdel Raheem A; Kim LH; Chang K; Lum TG; Chung BH; Choi YD; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 27539553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surgical and postoperative factors affecting length of hospital stay after radical prostatectomy.
Gardner TA; Bissonette EA; Petroni GR; McClain R; Sokoloff MH; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2000 Jul; 89(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 10918175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach.
Fabrizio MD; Tuerk I; Schellhammer PF
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2063-5. PubMed ID: 12771720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A single-institution comparison between radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy on perioperative and pathological outcomes for obese men: an analysis of the Duke Prostate Center database.
Fitzsimons NJ; Sun LL; Dahm P; Moul JW; Madden J; Gan TJ; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1146-51. PubMed ID: 18158036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Urology practice patterns after residency training in radical perineal prostatectomy.
Shay BF; Schmidt JD; Thomas R; Monga M
Urology; 2002 Nov; 60(5):766-9. PubMed ID: 12429292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in high prostate volume cases: impact on oncological and functional results.
Alessandro S; Alessandro G; Susanna C; Michele I; Francesca DQ; Andrea F; Von Heland M; Vincenzo G; Stefano S
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 27256175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of preoperative endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in predicting surgical difficulty for robotic prostatectomy.
Mason BM; Hakimi AA; Faleck D; Chernyak V; Rozenblitt A; Ghavamian R
Urology; 2010 Nov; 76(5):1130-5. PubMed ID: 20739048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radical perineal prostatectomy without pelvic lymphadenectomy: selection criteria and early results.
Parra RO; Isorna S; Perez MG; Cummings JM; Boullier JA
J Urol; 1996 Feb; 155(2):612-5. PubMed ID: 8558673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of a novel, extended approach of perineal radical prostatectomy on surgical margins in localized prostate cancer.
Inoue S; Shiina H; Sumura M; Urakami S; Matsubara A; Igawa M
BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 20067449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radical perineal prostatectomy: cost efficient, outcome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management.
Harris MJ
Eur Urol; 2003 Sep; 44(3):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 12932927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Gillitzer R; Thomas C; Wiesner C; Jones J; Schmidt F; Hampel C; Brenner W; Thüroff JW; Melchior SW
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 19969328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The association between the outcomes of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and the anthropometric measurements of the prostate by magnetic resonance imaging.
Permpongkosol S; Aramay S; Vattanakul T; Phongkitkarun S
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(2):238-247. PubMed ID: 29064657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
