These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23054375)
1. Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. Steinhauser G; Adlassnig W; Risch JA; Anderlini S; Arguriou P; Armendariz AZ; Bains W; Baker C; Barnes M; Barnett J; Baumgartner M; Baumgartner T; Bendall CA; Bender YS; Bichler M; Biermann T; Bini R; Blanco E; Bleau J; Brink A; Brown D; Burghuber C; Calne R; Carter B; Castaño C; Celec P; Celis ME; Clarke N; Cockrell D; Collins D; Coogan B; Craig J; Crilly C; Crowe D; Csoka AB; Darwich C; Del Kebos T; Derinaldi M; Dlamini B; Drewa T; Dwyer M; Eder F; de Palma RE; Esmay D; Rött CE; Exley C; Falkov R; Farber CI; Fearn W; Felsmann S; Flensmark J; Fletcher AK; Foster M; Fountoulakis KN; Fouratt J; Blanca JG; Sotelo MG; Gittler F; Gittler G; Gomez J; Gomez JF; Polar MG; Gonzalez J; Gösselsberger C; Habermacher L; Hajek M; Hakala F; Haliburton MS; Hankins JR; Hart J; Hasslberger S; Hennessey D; Herrmann A; Hersee M; Howard C; Humphries S; Isharc L; Ivanovski P; Jenuth S; Jerndal J; Johnson C; Keleta Y; Kenny A; Kidd B; Kohle F; Kolahi J; Koller-Peroutka M; Kostova L; Kumar A; Kurosawa A; Lance T; Lechermann M; Lendl B; Leuchters M; Lewis E; Lieb E; Lloyd G; Losek A; Lu Y; Maestracci S; Mangan D; Mares AW; Barnett JM; McClain V; McNair JS; Michael T; Miller L; Monzani P; Moran B; Morris M; Mößmer G; Mountain J; Phuthe OM; Muñoz M; Nakken S; Wambui AN; Neunteufl B; Nikolić D; Oberoi DV; Obmode G; Ogar L; Ohara J; Rybine NO; Owen B; Owen KW; Parikh R; Pearce NJ; Pemmer B; Piper C; Prince I; Reid T; Rindermann H; Risch S; Robbins J; Roberts S; Romero A; Rothe MT; Ruiz S; Sacher J; Sackl W; Salletmaier M; Sanand J; Sauerzopf C; Schwarzgruber T; Scott D; Seegers L; Seppi D; Shields K; Siller-Matula J; Singh B; Sithole S; Six F; Skoyles JR; Slofstra J; Sole DA; Sommer WF; Sonko M; Starr-Casanova CJ; Steakley ME; Steinhauser W; Steinhoff K; Sterba JH; Steppan M; Stindl R; Stokely J; Stokely K; St-Pierre G; Stratford J; Streli C; Stryg C; Sullivan M; Summhammer J; Tadesse A; Tavares D; Thompson L; Tomlinson A; Tozer J; Trevisanato SI; Trimmel M; Turner N; Vahur P; van der Byl J; van der Maas T; Varela L; Vega CA; Vermaak S; Villasenor A; Vogel M; von Wintzigerode G; Wagner C; Weinberger M; Weinberger P; Wilson N; Wolfe JF; Woodley MA; Young I; Zuraw G; Zwiren N Theor Med Bioeth; 2012 Oct; 33(5):359-76. PubMed ID: 23054375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical Hypotheses 2006 impact factor rises to 1.3--a vindication of the 'editorial review' system for revolutionary science. Charlton BG Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(5):967-9. PubMed ID: 17706892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal. Smolčić VŠ; Simundić AM Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 25351350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts. Enquselassie F Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors. Resnik DB; Elmore SA Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):169-88. PubMed ID: 25633924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Lovejoy TI; Revenson TA; France CR Ann Behav Med; 2011 Aug; 42(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21505912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Registered Reports in the Abt G; Boreham C; Davison G; Jackson R; Wallace E; Williams AM J Sports Sci; 2021 Aug; 39(16):1789-1790. PubMed ID: 34379576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How Publish or Perish Promotes Inaccuracy in Science -- and Journalism. Oransky I AMA J Ethics; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1172-5. PubMed ID: 26698592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication. Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Gerasimov AN; Kostyukova EI; Kitas GD J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1545-52. PubMed ID: 26538996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On peer review. Schuklenk U Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of peer review. Poland GA Vaccine; 2013 Jan; 31(4):567-83. PubMed ID: 23298688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike. Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ideas regarding developing, submitting, reviewing, and publishing a scientific manuscript: an editor's perspective. Apuzzo ML World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):443-6. PubMed ID: 24720909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors. Newton DP Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance? Weiner BK; Weiner JP; Smith HE Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 20207330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New directions for the Journal of Health Psychology. Annunziato RA; Locke A; Treharne GJ J Health Psychol; 2024 Oct; 29(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 39311522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guidelines for reviewers of the Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology (REED). Cienfuegos JA; Pérez-Cuadrado Martínez E Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2018 Jun; 110(6):342-343. PubMed ID: 29781283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]