These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23054375)
21. Keeping up journal integrity: the peer-review process. Moore KN J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2005; 32(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 15718949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.]. Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A book of ideas collected from Medical Hypotheses: Death can be cured by Roger Dobson. Charlton BG Med Hypotheses; 2008; 70(5):905-9. PubMed ID: 18280670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. So, You Want to Improve Your Plastic Surgery Papers? Introducing PRS' Friendly EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines. Rohrich RJ; Weinstein A Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jul; 136(1):205-208. PubMed ID: 25829154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for]. Thörn A Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Response to open peer commentaries on "Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs". Osborne NJ; Payne D; Newman ML Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):W3. PubMed ID: 20013483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Letter to the editor: reviewers. Senayli A; Senayli Y Account Res; 2012; 19(4):267-8. PubMed ID: 22861182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Spoof research paper is accepted by 157 journals. Hawkes N BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5975. PubMed ID: 24096966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study. Glonti K; Hren D BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Update on innovative initiatives for the American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. Stanley WC; Keehan KH Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2013 Apr; 304(8):H1045-9. PubMed ID: 23457015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study. Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology: premium space! Gilchrest BA J Invest Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):2671. PubMed ID: 23187104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Conflict of Interest in Journal Peer Review. Resnik DB; Elmore SA Toxicol Pathol; 2018 Feb; 46(2):112-114. PubMed ID: 29382273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):293-321. PubMed ID: 28905258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals. Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On being 'good' in the medical humanities. Bowman D Med Humanit; 2016 Mar; 42(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 26933199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Authorship policy of the Journal of Korean Medical Science. Hong ST J Korean Med Sci; 2010 May; 25(5):657. PubMed ID: 20436697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]