BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23054747)

  • 1. Measures of divergence of oriented patterns for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Chakraborty J; Mukhopadhyay S; Desautels JE
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Jul; 8(4):527-45. PubMed ID: 23054747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measures of angular spread and entropy for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
    Banik S; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Jan; 8(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 22460365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms via analysis of oriented patterns.
    Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Desautels JE
    J Vis Exp; 2013 Aug; (78):. PubMed ID: 24022326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.
    Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Desautels JE
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):611-31. PubMed ID: 20127270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gabor filters and phase portraits for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Ayres FJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Oct; 44(10):883-94. PubMed ID: 16991010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval-cancer cases with neural networks.
    Banik S; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6667-70. PubMed ID: 19964909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
    Banik S; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 20851789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An anatomically oriented breast coordinate system for mammogram analysis.
    Brandt SS; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Nielsen M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1841-51. PubMed ID: 21609879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Feb; 23(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 14964567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of a fully automated system for detection and diagnosis of mammographic lesions.
    Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangieri F; Rangayyan RM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():4667-70. PubMed ID: 25571033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A computer-aided detection of the architectural distortion in digital mammograms using the fractal dimension measurements of BEMD.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():173-184. PubMed ID: 29691123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing Architectural Distortion in Mammograms by Linear Saliency.
    Narváez F; Alvarez J; Garcia-Arteaga JD; Tarquino J; Romero E
    J Med Syst; 2017 Feb; 41(2):26. PubMed ID: 28005248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
    van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving mass candidate detection in mammograms via feature maxima propagation and local feature selection.
    Melendez J; Sánchez CI; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081904. PubMed ID: 25086535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows.
    Nemoto M; Honmura S; Shimizu A; Furukawa D; Kobatake H; Nawano S
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20033599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical mode decomposition of digital mammograms for the statistical based characterization of architectural distortion.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():109-12. PubMed ID: 26736212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.