BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23054771)

  • 1. Applicability of a modified MCE filter method with Button Inhalable Sampler for monitoring personal bioaerosol inhalation exposure.
    Xu Z; Xu H; Yao M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 May; 20(5):2963-72. PubMed ID: 23054771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring of bioaerosol inhalation risks in different environments using a six-stage Andersen sampler and the PCR-DGGE method.
    Xu Z; Yao M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 May; 185(5):3993-4003. PubMed ID: 22955887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing bioaerosol sampling by Andersen impactors using mineral-oil-spread agar plate.
    Xu Z; Wei K; Wu Y; Shen F; Chen Q; Li M; Yao M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56896. PubMed ID: 23460818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The suitability of the IOM foam sampler for bioaerosol sampling in Occupational Environments.
    Haatainen S; Laitinen J; Linnainmaa M; Reponen T; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19904652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of molecular and total ATP-based analytical methods with culture for the analysis of bioaerosols.
    Kim SY; Kim ZY; Lee S; Ko G
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Apr; 409(9):1732-7. PubMed ID: 21329966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of personal inhalable aerosol samplers with different filters for use during anthrax responses.
    Grinshpun SA; Weber AM; Yermakov M; Indugula R; Elmashae Y; Reponen T; Rose L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Aug; 14(8):585-595. PubMed ID: 28506101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation of airborne bacteria and fungi at Emperor Qin's Terra-Cotta Museum, Xi'an, China, during the "Oct. 1" gold week period of 2006.
    Chen YP; Cui Y; Dong JG
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2010 Feb; 17(2):478-85. PubMed ID: 19479295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of high volume portable aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and qPCR in monitoring bioaerosols.
    He Q; Yao M
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Mar; 13(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 21258725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between indoor and outdoor bio-aerosols collected with a button inhalable aerosol sampler in urban homes.
    Lee T; Grinshpun SA; Martuzevicius D; Adhikari A; Crawford CM; Luo J; Reponen T
    Indoor Air; 2006 Feb; 16(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16420496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of workers' exposure to bioaerosols in a French cheese factory.
    Simon X; Duquenne P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Jul; 58(6):677-92. PubMed ID: 24812257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are we biologically safe with snow precipitation? A case study in beijing.
    Shen F; Yao M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65249. PubMed ID: 23762327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Culture-independent characterization of bacteria and fungi in a poultry bioaerosol using pyrosequencing: a new approach.
    Nonnenmann MW; Bextine B; Dowd SE; Gilmore K; Levin JL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Dec; 7(12):693-9. PubMed ID: 21058154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioaerosol sampling by a personal rotating cup sampler CIP 10-M.
    Görner P; Fabriès JF; Duquenne P; Witschger O; Wrobel R
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16395458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC; Bowry A; Crook B; Stancliffe JD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collection efficiency of liquid-based samplers for fungi in indoor air.
    Chang CW; Ting YT; Horng YJ
    Indoor Air; 2019 May; 29(3):380-389. PubMed ID: 30614570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
    Yao M; Mainelis G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.