337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23054771)
41. A Simple and Disposable Sampler for Inhalable Aerosol.
L'Orange C; Anderson K; Sleeth D; Anthony TR; Volckens J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Mar; 60(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 26467335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Development of Three-Stage Bioaerosol Sampler for Size-Selective Sampling.
Lim JH; Nam SH; Kim J; Kim NH; Park GS; Maeng JS; Yook SJ
J Biomech Eng; 2022 Jul; 144(7):. PubMed ID: 35013744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Characterization of seasonal indoor and outdoor bioaerosols in the arid environment of El Paso, Texas.
Mota LC; Gibbs SG; Green CF; Payan F; Tarwater PM; Ortiz M
J Environ Health; 2008 Jun; 70(10):48-53. PubMed ID: 18561569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A two-stage cyclone using microcentrifuge tubes for personal bioaerosol sampling.
Lindsley WG; Schmechel D; Chen BT
J Environ Monit; 2006 Nov; 8(11):1136-42. PubMed ID: 17075620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
Lee KS; Bartlett KH; Brauer M; Stephens GM; Black WA; Teschke K
Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring by combined aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence assay.
Park JW; Kim HR; Hwang J
Anal Chim Acta; 2016 Oct; 941():101-107. PubMed ID: 27692374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air.
Chang CW; Chou FC
Indoor Air; 2011 Aug; 21(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 21198889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Characteristics of indoor and outdoor bioaerosols at Korean high-rise apartment buildings.
Lee JH; Jo WK
Environ Res; 2006 May; 101(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16199028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Microbial contents of vacuum cleaner bag dust and emitted bioaerosols and their implications for human exposure indoors.
Veillette M; Knibbs LD; Pelletier A; Charlebois R; Blais Lecours P; He C; Morawska L; Duchaine C
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2013 Oct; 79(20):6331-6. PubMed ID: 23934489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Profiles of airborne fungi in buildings and outdoor environments in the United States.
Shelton BG; Kirkland KH; Flanders WD; Morris GK
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Apr; 68(4):1743-53. PubMed ID: 11916692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effect of filter material on bioaerosol collection of Bacillus subtilis spores used as a Bacillus anthracis simulant.
Clark Burton N; Adhikari A; Grinshpun SA; Hornung R; Reponen T
J Environ Monit; 2005 May; 7(5):475-80. PubMed ID: 15877169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Bioaerosols in residential micro-environments in low income countries: a case study from Pakistan.
Nasir ZA; Colbeck I; Sultan S; Ahmed S
Environ Pollut; 2012 Sep; 168():15-22. PubMed ID: 22584111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus-infected ferrets.
Bekking C; Yip L; Groulx N; Doggett N; Finn M; Mubareka S
Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2019 Nov; 13(6):564-573. PubMed ID: 31541519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Quantitative assessment of microbes from samples of indoor air and dust.
Leppänen HK; Täubel M; Jayaprakash B; Vepsäläinen A; Pasanen P; Hyvärinen A
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2018 May; 28(3):231-241. PubMed ID: 28975927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Analysis of airborne microbial communities using 16S ribosomal RNA: Potential bias due to air sampling stress.
Zhen H; Krumins V; Fennell DE; Mainelis G
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 621():939-947. PubMed ID: 29079080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Development of a size-selective sampler combined with an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for the rapid measurement of bioaerosols.
Liao L; Byeon JH; Park JH
Environ Res; 2021 Mar; 194():110615. PubMed ID: 33309960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of air samplers and filter materials for collection and recovery of airborne norovirus.
Uhrbrand K; Koponen IK; Schultz AC; Madsen AM
J Appl Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 124(4):990-1000. PubMed ID: 28921812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
Lidén G; Surakka J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
