204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23055172)
1. Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form.
Lynott D; Connell L
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):516-26. PubMed ID: 23055172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space.
Speed LJ; Majid A
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2204-2218. PubMed ID: 28155185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual Experience Norms for 506 Russian Nouns: Modality Rating, Spatial Localization, Manipulability, Imageability and Other Variables.
Miklashevsky A
J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):641-661. PubMed ID: 29282595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual and auditory perceptual strength norms for 3,596 French nouns and their relationship with other psycholinguistic variables.
Chedid G; Brambati SM; Bedetti C; Rey AE; Wilson MA; Vallet GT
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2094-2105. PubMed ID: 31016685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A sharp image or a sharp knife: norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items.
van Dantzig S; Cowell RA; Zeelenberg R; Pecher D
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 21287109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A little goes a long way: evidence for a perceptual basis of learning for the noun categories count and mass.
McPherson LM
J Child Lang; 1991 Jun; 18(2):315-38. PubMed ID: 1874830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability.
Connell L; Lynott D
Cognition; 2012 Dec; 125(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 22935248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandarin Chinese modality exclusivity norms.
Chen IH; Zhao Q; Long Y; Lu Q; Huang CR
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211336. PubMed ID: 30785906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Italian Sensorimotor Norms: Perception and action strength measures for 959 words.
Repetto C; Rodella C; Conca F; Santi GC; Catricalà E
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4035-4047. PubMed ID: 36307624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Augmented Modality Exclusivity Norms for Concrete and Abstract Italian Property Words.
Morucci P; Bottini R; Crepaldi D
J Cogn; 2019 Oct; 2(1):42. PubMed ID: 31709385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.
Miceli A; Wauthia E; Lefebvre L; Ris L; Simoes Loureiro I
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():667271. PubMed ID: 34177725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties.
Lynott D; Connell L
Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):558-64. PubMed ID: 19363198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual complexity and form class cues in novel word extension tasks: how 4-year-old children interpret adjectives and count nouns.
Sandhofer CM; Smith LB
Dev Sci; 2004 Jun; 7(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 15595376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.
Lynott D; Connell L; Brysbaert M; Brand J; Carney J
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1271-1291. PubMed ID: 31832879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interoception: the forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts.
Connell L; Lynott D; Banks B
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Aug; 373(1752):. PubMed ID: 29915011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage.
Winter B; Perlman M; Majid A
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():213-220. PubMed ID: 29966914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dutch sensory modality norms.
Speed LJ; Brybaert M
Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1306-1318. PubMed ID: 34505998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: new evidence on the role of syntax and semantics.
Froud K; van der Lely HK
J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(3):274-303. PubMed ID: 18206904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feats: A database of semantic features for early produced noun concepts.
Borovsky A; Peters RE; Cox JI; McRae K
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3259-3279. PubMed ID: 38148439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tangible words are recognized faster: the grounding of meaning in sensory and perceptual systems.
Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Dicke J; Taylor SC; Gullick MM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1683-91. PubMed ID: 21892884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
