These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23055960)

  • 21. Turn taking in atypical conversations: the case of the speaker/augmented-communicator dyad.
    Buzolich MJ; Wiemann JM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 2965282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cognitive and behavioural predictors of adolescents' communicative perspective-taking and social relationships.
    Nilsen ES; Bacso SA
    J Adolesc; 2017 Apr; 56():52-63. PubMed ID: 28157666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural correlates of intentional communication.
    Noordzij ML; Newman-Norlund SE; de Ruiter JP; Hagoort P; Levinson SC; Toni I
    Front Neurosci; 2010; 4():188. PubMed ID: 21151781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perspective taking in a novel signaling task: Effects of world knowledge and contextual constraint.
    Sulik J; Lupyan G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Nov; 147(11):1619-1640. PubMed ID: 30372113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning.
    Stolk A; Noordzij ML; Verhagen L; Volman I; Schoffelen JM; Oostenveld R; Hagoort P; Toni I
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(51):18183-8. PubMed ID: 25489093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Mechanistic Framework for Explaining Audience Design in Language Production.
    Ferreira VS
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():29-51. PubMed ID: 30231000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do addressees adopt the perspective of the speaker?
    Pickering MJ; McLean JF; Gambi C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 22727911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adjustment of speaker's referential expressions to an addressee's likely knowledge and link with theory of mind abilities.
    Achim AM; Fossard M; Couture S; Achim A
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():823. PubMed ID: 26136711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How dogs know when communication is intended for them.
    Kaminski J; Schulz L; Tomasello M
    Dev Sci; 2012 Mar; 15(2):222-32. PubMed ID: 22356178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Understanding the abstract role of speech in communication at 12 months.
    Martin A; Onishi KH; Vouloumanos A
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 22209584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Communicative intent modulates production and comprehension of actions and gestures: A Kinect study.
    Trujillo JP; Simanova I; Bekkering H; Özyürek A
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():38-51. PubMed ID: 29981967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coordination of knowledge in communication: effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know.
    Fussell SR; Krauss RM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Mar; 62(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 1560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Context-sensitive adjustment of pointing in great apes.
    Tauzin T; Bohn M; Gergely G; Call J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):1048. PubMed ID: 31974479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intentional communication: computationally easy or difficult?
    van Rooij I; Kwisthout J; Blokpoel M; Szymanik J; Wareham T; Toni I
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2011; 5():52. PubMed ID: 21747765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-year-olds hide their communicative intentions in appropriate contexts.
    Grosse G; Scott-Phillips TC; Tomasello M
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Nov; 49(11):2095-101. PubMed ID: 23477533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Real-time communicative perspective taking in younger and older adults.
    Saryazdi R; Chambers CG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Mar; 47(3):439-454. PubMed ID: 33001700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 1- and 2-year-olds' expectations about third-party communicative actions.
    Thorgrimsson GB; Fawcett C; Liszkowski U
    Infant Behav Dev; 2015 May; 39():53-66. PubMed ID: 25766104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lost in thought: cognitive load and the processing of addressees' feedback in verbal communication.
    Rossnagel CS
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 15267127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A job interview in the MRI scanner: How does indirectness affect addressees and overhearers?
    Bašnáková J; van Berkum J; Weber K; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Sep; 76():79-91. PubMed ID: 25858603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The communication orientation model: explaining the diverse effects of sight, sound, and synchronicity on negotiation and group decision-making outcomes.
    Swaab RI; Galinsky AD; Medvec V; Diermeier DA
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2012 Feb; 16(1):25-53. PubMed ID: 21846835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.