342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23057045)
1. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of Implant Inclination on Stress Distribution in Mandibular Overdentures.
Ebadian B; Mosharraf R; Khodaeian N
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 23574403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Implant Positions and Occlusal Forces on Peri-Implant Bone Stress in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Martin-Fernandez E; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Dec; 43(6):419-428. PubMed ID: 28972823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of different implant positions on strain developed around four implants supporting a mandibular overdenture with rigid telescopic copings.
ELsyad MA; Elsaadawy MG; Abdou AM; Habib AA
Quintessence Int; 2013 Oct; 44(9):679-86. PubMed ID: 23479591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Mandibles with Different Bone Types Loaded by Implant-Supported Overdentures with Different Localizations of Locator Attachments.
Yıldırım RS; Buyukerkmen EB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):851-862. PubMed ID: 34698710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Implant Height Differences on Different Attachment Types and Peri-Implant Bone in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: 3D Finite Element Study.
Ozan O; Ramoglu S
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):e50-9. PubMed ID: 24471769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical Study of Optimal Implant Position for Maxillary Implant-Supported Overdentures Using Three-Dimensional Simulation Software.
Kamei K; Gonda T; Takahashi T; Maeda Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(6):619–626. PubMed ID: 30192350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peri-implant strain around mesially inclined two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments.
Elsyad MA; Eltowery SM; Gebreel AA
J Oral Sci; 2017 Dec; 59(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 29093282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stresses induced by mesially and distally placed implants to retain a mandibular distal-extension removable partial overdenture: a comparative study.
Hegazy SA; Elshahawi IM; Elmotayam H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):403-7. PubMed ID: 23527341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Labial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Different Resilient Stud Attachments for Mandibular Implant Overdentures: An In vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ibrahim AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):381–389. PubMed ID: 30703183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution with Two Attachment Systems of Varying Heights in a Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Khurana N; Rodrigues S; Shenoy S; Saldanha S; Pai U; Shetty T; N S; Mahesh M; Hegde P
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e795-e805. PubMed ID: 30191668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
