These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23057140)

  • 1. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review.
    Nam D; McArthur BA; Cross MB; Pearle AD; Mayman DJ; Haas SB
    J Knee Surg; 2012 Jul; 25(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 23057140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved.
    Sassoon A; Nam D; Nunley R; Barrack R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 25059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty.
    Nam D; Maher PA; Rebolledo BJ; Nawabi DH; McLawhorn AS; Pearle AD
    Knee; 2013 Aug; 20(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 23347791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of component alignment in custom cutting blocks compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty instrumentation: prospective control trial.
    Chotanaphuti T; Wangwittayakul V; Khuangsirikul S; Foojareonyos T
    Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 23999209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of MRI-based vs. CT-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.
    An VV; Sivakumar BS; Phan K; Levy YD; Bruce WJ
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 27823847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Mark Coventry Award: Custom Cutting Guides Do Not Improve Total Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes at 2 Years Followup.
    Nam D; Park A; Stambough JB; Johnson SR; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25712865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review.
    Camarda L; D'Arienzo A; Morello S; Peri G; Valentino B; D'Arienzo M
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2015 Apr; 99(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 25304253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Total and unicompartmental knee replacement. Patient-specific Instrumentation].
    Köster G; Biró C
    Orthopade; 2016 Apr; 45(4):302-13. PubMed ID: 27025869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of custom cutting guides on patient satisfaction and residual symptoms following total knee arthroplasty.
    Nam D; Nunley RM; Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Barrack RL
    Knee; 2016 Jan; 23(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 26746042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the iAssist Handheld Guidance System to Conventional Instruments for Mechanical Axis Restoration in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Kinney MC; Cidambi KR; Severns DL; Gonzales FB
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 28867520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-specific instrumentation development in TKA: 1st and 2nd generation designs in comparison with conventional instrumentation.
    Kwon OR; Kang KT; Son J; Suh DS; Heo DB; Koh YG
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Jan; 137(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 28005167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty with patient specific and conventional instruments: A randomized controlled trial.
    De Vloo R; Pellikaan P; Dhollander A; Vander Sloten J
    Knee; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1469-1477. PubMed ID: 28943039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can technology improve alignment during knee arthroplasty.
    Thienpont E; Fennema P; Price A
    Knee; 2013 Sep; 20 Suppl 1():S21-8. PubMed ID: 24034591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.
    Jauregui JJ; Cherian JJ; Kapadia BH; Banerjee S; Issa K; Harwin SF; Mont MA
    J Knee Surg; 2014 Jun; 27(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 24764234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: peri-operative and cost differences.
    DeHaan AM; Adams JR; DeHart ML; Huff TW
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2065-9. PubMed ID: 25065735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.
    Barrett W; Hoeffel D; Dalury D; Mason JB; Murphy J; Himden S
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):343-7. PubMed ID: 23993343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alignment and component position after patient-matched instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
    Pourgiezis N; Reddy SP; Nankivell M; Morrison G; VanEssen J
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2016 Aug; 24(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 27574257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.
    Voleti PB; Hamula MJ; Baldwin KD; Lee GC
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1709-12. PubMed ID: 24961893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative Study Between Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Technique in TKA.
    Lee SH; Song EK; Seon JK; Seol YJ; Prakash J; Lee WG
    Orthopedics; 2016 May; 39(3 Suppl):S83-7. PubMed ID: 27219736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient-specific cutting blocks: Of Unproven Value.
    Lee GC
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Jan; 98-B(1 Suppl A):78-80. PubMed ID: 26733647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.