BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23057343)

  • 1. The impact of early weight-bearing on results following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Kaya S; Unal YC; Guven N; Ozcan C; Dundar A; Turkozu T; Ozkan S; Adanas C; Gokalp MA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 May; 25(1):395. PubMed ID: 38773398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Early effectiveness of local injection of multimodal drug cocktail during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its influence on cartilage].
    Yu H; Dong Z; Shi Z; Li L; Dong K; Liu H; Li Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 May; 38(5):562-569. PubMed ID: 38752242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patellar Tendon Reconstruction Using Tibialis Posterior Allograft for Treatment of Patellar Tendon Rupture After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Renshaw A; Few WE; Desai B; Godshaw B; Jones D
    Ochsner J; 2024; 24(2):151-156. PubMed ID: 38912180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of autograft or allograft in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Kustos T; Bálint L; Than P; Bárdos T
    Int Orthop; 2004 Oct; 28(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 15168083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft, the Incidence of Anterior Knee Pain Ranges From 5.4% to 48.4% and the Incidence of Kneeling Pain Ranges From 4.0% to 75.6%: A Systematic Review of Level I Studies.
    Peebles LA; Akamefula RA; Aman ZS; Verma A; Scillia AJ; Mulcahey MK; Kraeutler MJ
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2024 Apr; 6(2):100902. PubMed ID: 38562662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-rater reliability of an ultrasound protocol to evaluate the anterolateral ligament of the knee.
    Kandel M; Cattrysse E; De Maeseneer M; Lenchik L; Paantjens M; Leeuw M
    J Ultrason; 2019 Nov; 19(78):181-186. PubMed ID: 31807322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Treatment and rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Norway. A comparison with the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Study Group].
    Engebretsen L; Tegnander A; Benum P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 Apr; 109(12):1288-90. PubMed ID: 2734757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term results of a randomized study on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without a synthetic degradable augmentation device to support the autograft.
    Peterson L; Eklund U; Engström B; Forssblad M; Saartok T; Valentin A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Sep; 22(9):2109-20. PubMed ID: 23996068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autografts vs Synthetics for Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Sun J; Wei XC; Li L; Cao XM; Li K; Guo L; Lu JG; Duan ZQ; Xiang C; Wei L
    Orthop Surg; 2020 Apr; 12(2):378-387. PubMed ID: 32180364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS™ artificial ligament results at a mean follow-up of eight years.
    Parchi PD; Gianluca C; Dolfi L; Baluganti A; Nicola P; Chiellini F; Lisanti M
    Int Orthop; 2013 Aug; 37(8):1567-74. PubMed ID: 23812539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Pan X; Wen H; Wang L; Ge T
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Oct; 23(7):819-23. PubMed ID: 23412205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft: technique and 2- to 5-year follow-up.
    Jiang D; Ao YF; Gong X; Wang YJ; Luo H; Chen LX; Wang HJ; Xie X; Zhang JY; Yu JK
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 May; 40(5):1084-92. PubMed ID: 22472270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Network meta-analysis of knee outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with various types of tendon grafts.
    Yang XG; Wang F; He X; Feng JT; Hu YC; Zhang H; Yang L; Hua K
    Int Orthop; 2020 Feb; 44(2):365-380. PubMed ID: 31858199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A comparison of effectiveness between ligament advanced reinforcement system and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].
    Li Y; Zhang W; Wu Y; Wang H; Kang L; Hu M; Chen G; Zhu B
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1045-50. PubMed ID: 23057343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Xie X; Liu X; Chen Z; Yu Y; Peng S; Li Q
    Knee; 2015 Mar; 22(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 25547048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efficacy comparison between a new generation of artificial ligaments and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament revision].
    Peng Y; Xu JC; Fu DJ; Yang L; Guo L
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Mar; 103(11):822-828. PubMed ID: 36925115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.