419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23057750)
1. Ipilimumab in 2nd line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Barzey V; Atkins MB; Garrison LP; Asukai Y; Kotapati S; Penrod JR
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(2):202-12. PubMed ID: 23057750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Compared with Ipilimumab for the Treatment of BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma in Australia.
Bohensky MA; Pasupathi K; Gorelik A; Kim H; Harrison JP; Liew D
Value Health; 2016 Dec; 19(8):1009-1015. PubMed ID: 27987627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy Compared with Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma in the United States.
Oh A; Tran DM; McDowell LC; Keyvani D; Barcelon JA; Merino O; Wilson L
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jun; 23(6):653-664. PubMed ID: 28530525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma Treatment in Portugal.
Miguel LS; Lopes FV; Pinheiro B; Wang J; Xu R; Pellissier J; Laires PA
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 28964438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic Evaluation of Talimogene Laherparepvec Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy vs Ipilimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Melanoma.
Almutairi AR; Alkhatib NS; Oh M; Curiel-Lewandrowski C; Babiker HM; Cranmer LD; McBride A; Abraham I
JAMA Dermatol; 2019 Jan; 155(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30477000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Versus Ipilimumab in Ipilimumab-Naïve Patients with Advanced Melanoma in the United States.
Wang J; Chmielowski B; Pellissier J; Xu R; Stevinson K; Liu FX
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Feb; 23(2):184-194. PubMed ID: 28125365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cohort versus patient level simulation for the economic evaluation of single versus combination immuno-oncology therapies in metastatic melanoma.
Gibson EJ; Begum N; Koblbauer I; Dranitsaris G; Liew D; McEwan P; Yuan Y; Juarez-Garcia A; Tyas D; Pritchard C
J Med Econ; 2019 Jun; 22(6):531-544. PubMed ID: 30638416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the adjuvant treatment of resected high-risk stage III melanoma in the United States.
Bensimon AG; Zhou ZY; Jenkins M; Song Y; Gao W; Signorovitch J; Krepler C; Liu FX; Wang J; Aguiar-Ibáñez R
J Med Econ; 2019 Oct; 22(10):981-993. PubMed ID: 31012765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How Does Option Value Affect the Potential Cost-Effectiveness of a Treatment? The Case of Ipilimumab for Metastatic Melanoma.
Li M; Basu A; Bennette C; Veenstra D; Garrison LP
Value Health; 2019 Jul; 22(7):777-784. PubMed ID: 31277824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma.
Kohn CG; Zeichner SB; Chen Q; Montero AJ; Goldstein DA; Flowers CR
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(11):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 28221865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting for treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.
Garrison LP; Lubeck D; Lalla D; Paton V; Dueck A; Perez EA
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 17592827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ipilimumab for Previously Untreated Unresectable Malignant Melanoma: A Critique of the Evidence.
Giannopoulou C; Sideris E; Wade R; Moe-Byrne T; Eastwood A; McKenna C
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1269-79. PubMed ID: 26043718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation.
Retèl VP; Steuten LMG; Geukes Foppen MH; Mewes JC; Lindenberg MA; Haanen JBAG; van Harten WH
BMC Cancer; 2018 Sep; 18(1):895. PubMed ID: 30219040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accounting for Cured Patients in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Othus M; Bansal A; Koepl L; Wagner S; Ramsey S
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):705-709. PubMed ID: 28408015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib for second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Hoyle M; Green C; Thompson-Coon J; Liu Z; Welch K; Moxham T; Stein K
Value Health; 2010; 13(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19804431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frontline BRAF Testing-Guided Treatment for Advanced Melanoma in the Era of Immunotherapies: A Cost-Utility Analysis Based on Long-term Survival Data.
Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 156(11):1177-1184. PubMed ID: 32697281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic analysis of decitabine versus best supportive care in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes from a US payer perspective.
Pan F; Peng S; Fleurence R; Linnehan JE; Knopf K; Kim E
Clin Ther; 2010 Dec; 32(14):2444-56. PubMed ID: 21353113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of adding rh-endostatin to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in China.
Wu B; Chen H; Shen J; Ye M
Clin Ther; 2011 Oct; 33(10):1446-55. PubMed ID: 21992806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic Evaluation of Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme.
Kovic B; Xie F
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(20):2296-302. PubMed ID: 26014296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
