These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23059114)

  • 1. Evaluation of an antimicrobial surgical glove to inactivate live human immunodeficiency virus following simulated glove puncture.
    Edmiston CE; Zhou SS; Hoerner P; Krikorian R; Krepel CJ; Lewis BD; Brown KR; Rossi PJ; Graham MB; Seabrook GR
    Surgery; 2013 Feb; 153(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 23059114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virus-inhibiting surgical glove to reduce the risk of infection by enveloped viruses.
    Bricout F; Moraillon A; Sonntag P; Hoerner P; Blackwelder W; Plotkin S
    J Med Virol; 2003 Apr; 69(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 12601762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of an innovative antimicrobial surgical glove technology to reduce the risk of microbial passage following intraoperative perforation.
    Daeschlein G; Kramer A; Arnold A; Ladwig A; Seabrook GR; Edmiston CE
    Am J Infect Control; 2011 Mar; 39(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 20864217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Needlestick fluid transmission through surgical gloves of the same thickness.
    Din SU; Tidley MG
    Occup Med (Lond); 2014 Jan; 64(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 24265256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardization of needlestick injury and evaluation of a novel virus-inhibiting protective glove.
    Krikorian R; Lozach-Perlant A; Ferrier-Rembert A; Hoerner P; Sonntag P; Garin D; Crance JM
    J Hosp Infect; 2007 Aug; 66(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 17688971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of glove combinations in reducing cell culture infection after glove puncture with needles contaminated with human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
    Johnson GK; Nolan T; Wuh HC; Robinson WS
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1991 Jul; 12(7):435-8. PubMed ID: 1655872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An enzyme-mediated assay to quantify inoculation volume delivered by suture needlestick injury: two gloves are better than one.
    Lefebvre DR; Strande LF; Hewitt CW
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jan; 206(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 18155576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 4 different types of surgical gloves used for preventing blood contact.
    Wittmann A; Kralj N; Köver J; Gasthaus K; Lerch H; Hofmann F
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 May; 31(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 20334549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and performance of innovative surgical double-glove hole puncture indication systems.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Heather CL; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(2):69-83. PubMed ID: 14510280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glove perforation during surgery: what are the risks?
    Green SE; Gompertz RH
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Sep; 74(5):306-8. PubMed ID: 1416698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Update on the Innovative Surgical Double-Glove Hole Puncture Indication Systems: Reliability and Performance.
    Edlich R; Wind TC; Heather CL; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2017; 27(2-4):339-353. PubMed ID: 29773048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantity of blood inoculated in a needlestick injury from suture needles.
    Bennett NT; Howard RJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 8173718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing accidental injuries during surgery.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Hill LG; Thacker JG; McGregor W
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12825744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of surgical glove integrity.
    Sohn RL; Murray MT; Franko A; Hwang PK; Dulchavsky SA; Grimm MJ
    Am Surg; 2000 Mar; 66(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 10759204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of double gloves to protect the surgeon from blood contact during aesthetic procedures.
    Greco RJ; Garza JR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 1995; 19(3):265-7. PubMed ID: 7668175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Al-Maiyah M; Bajwa A; Mackenney P; Port A; Gregg PJ; Hill D; Finn P
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Apr; 87(4):556-9. PubMed ID: 15795210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.
    Guo YP; Wong PM; Li Y; Or PP
    Am J Surg; 2012 Aug; 204(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 22342011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Perforation of surgical gloves in gynecologic operations and abdominal Cesarean section].
    König M; Bruha M; Hirsch HA
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Feb; 52(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 1533198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study.
    Chan KY; Singh VA; Oun BH; To BH
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Dec; 61 Suppl B():3-7. PubMed ID: 17605178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective randomized assessment of single versus double-gloving for general surgical procedures.
    Na'aya HU; Madziga AG; Eni UE
    Niger J Med; 2009; 18(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 19485153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.