These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2305912)

  • 21. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physician incentives and the timing of cesarean sections: evidence from California.
    Spetz J; Smith MW; Ennis SF
    Med Care; 2001 Jun; 39(6):536-50. PubMed ID: 11404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.
    Myers SA; Gleicher N
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Dec; 319(23):1511-6. PubMed ID: 3185675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changing caesarean section rates. Experience at a Sydney obstetric teaching hospital.
    Blumenthal NJ; Harris RS; O'Connor MC; Lancaster PA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Nov; 24(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 6598375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors leading to cesarean section delivery at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective record review.
    Abebe FE; Gebeyehu AW; Kidane AN; Eyassu GA
    Reprod Health; 2016 Jan; 13():6. PubMed ID: 26792611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.
    Anderson GM; Lomas J
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Oct; 311(14):887-92. PubMed ID: 6472401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reversing the upward trend in the cesarean section rate.
    Peter J; Amir W; Eitan P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Jun; 25(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3609425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Why pay extra for cesarean-section deliveries?
    Finkler MD; Wirtschafter DD
    Inquiry; 1993; 30(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8314609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variations in the use of cesarean delivery for dystocia: lessons about the source of care.
    McCloskey L; Petitti DB; Hobel CJ
    Med Care; 1992 Feb; 30(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 1736018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies?
    Anderson GM; Lomas J
    Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Feb; 132(3):253-6, 259. PubMed ID: 3967160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section.
    Hughey MJ; LaPata RE; McElin TW; Lussky R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May; 49(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 850561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changing rates and indications for cesarean sections at a community hospital from 1972 to 1979.
    Sehgal NN
    J Community Health; 1981; 7(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 7320229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cesarean section deliveries in one health insurance hospital in Alexandria.
    Labib NY; Mortada MM; Guirguis WW; Abd El-Aziz HM
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2007; 82(3-4):299-317. PubMed ID: 18410714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cesarean section; changing patterns in Saudi Arabia.
    Chattopadhyay SK; Sengupta PB; Edrees YB; Lambourne A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1987 Oct; 25(5):387-94. PubMed ID: 2889633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of cesarean section in a private health service in Brazil: indications and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates.
    Almeida MA; Araujo Júnior E; Camano L; Peixoto AB; Martins WP; Mattar R
    Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 29510632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.
    Nakamura-Pereira M; do Carmo Leal M; Esteves-Pereira AP; Domingues RM; Torres JA; Dias MA; Moreira ME
    Reprod Health; 2016 Oct; 13(Suppl 3):128. PubMed ID: 27766941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Incidence of and factors associated with primary cesarean section in Benin (Africa)].
    Fourn L; Alihonou E; Seguin L; Ducic S
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8134665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Managing the primary cesarean delivery rate.
    Branch DW; Silver RM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 55(4):946-60. PubMed ID: 23090464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.