These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23059572)

  • 21. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of dentoalveolar protrusion values in Moroccans and other populations.
    Lahlou K; Bahoum A; Makhoukhi MB; Aalloula el H
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 20018796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Steiner's cephalometric norms for the Nepalese population.
    Sharma JN
    J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 21367825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Palestinians norms of Steiner cephalometric analysis.
    Hussien E; Al-Khateeb S; Mowais MA
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e5-9. PubMed ID: 21490988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranian Class I adults with good occlusions and balanced faces.
    Amini F; Razavian ZS; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 26853371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between two different ethnic groups: a comparative study.
    Hashim HA; AlBarakati SF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 May; 4(2):60-73. PubMed ID: 12761590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery in black American adults.
    Flynn TR; Ambrogio RI; Zeichner SJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 Jan; 47(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 2911056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15014417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
    Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis.
    Joshi M; Wu LP; Maharjan S; Regmi MR
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26061982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses.
    Bishara SE; Hession TJ; Peterson LC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 3862344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
    Holdaway RA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cephalometric assessment of soft tissue morphology of patients with acromegaly.
    Bavbek NC; Tuncer BB; Tuncer C; Gungor K; Ozkan C; Arslan E; Altinova AE; Akturk M; Toruner FB
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 27468591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a north Indian ethnic population.
    Sachan A; Srivastav A; Chaturvedi TP
    J Orthod Sci; 2012 Oct; 1(4):92-7. PubMed ID: 24987634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of mandibular divergence on facial soft tissue thickness in class I patients: a cephalometric study.
    Perović TM; Blažej M; Jovanović I
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 33778942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Three-dimensional study of facial soft tissue changes in patients with skeletal Class
    Shi Y; Shang H; Tian L; Bai S; Liu W; Liu Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 32(5):612-616. PubMed ID: 29806352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.