225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23059703)
1. Biomechanics of Posterior Dynamic Fusion Systems in the Lumbar Spine: Implications for Stabilization With Improved Arthrodesis.
Yu AK; Siegfried CM; Chew B; Hobbs J; Sabersky A; Jho DJ; Cook DJ; Bellotte JB; Whiting DM; Cheng BC
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):E325-30. PubMed ID: 23059703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Stand Alone Versus Facet Screw and Pedicle Screw Augmented Lateral Interbody Arthrodesis: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model.
Kretzer RM; Molina C; Hu N; Umekoji H; Baaj AA; Serhan H; Cunningham BW
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):E336-43. PubMed ID: 27137151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.
Kornblum MB; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Zatushevsky MA; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23295035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization.
Bozkuş H; Senoğlu M; Baek S; Sawa AG; Ozer AF; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 20121354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanics of dynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness with lumbosacral fusion.
Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Yaqoobi AS; Brasiliense LB; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep; 73(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 23756746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanics of a lumbar interspinous anchor with transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation.
Kaibara T; Karahalios DG; Porter RW; Kakarla UK; Reyes PM; Choi SK; Yaqoobi AS; Crawford NR
World Neurosurg; 2010 May; 73(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 20920945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanics of posterior instrumentation in L1-L3 lateral interbody fusion: Pedicle screw rod construct vs. transfacet pedicle screws.
Chin KR; Newcomb AG; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Hickam GA; Gabriel J; Pencle FJ; Sung RD; Crawford NR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Jan; 31():59-64. PubMed ID: 26499776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.
Wang T; Liu H; Zheng Z; Li Z; Wang J; Shrivastava SS; Yang H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E925-9. PubMed ID: 23609200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with integrated fixation and adjunctive posterior stabilization: A comparative biomechanical analysis.
Yeager MS; Dupre DA; Cook DJ; Oh MY; Altman DT; Cheng BC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Oct; 30(8):769-74. PubMed ID: 26169603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhang M
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2342-2350. PubMed ID: 33948750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
