These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23059930)

  • 1. Re: commentary: poor quality evidence suggests that failure rates for atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional amalgam are similar.
    Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V
    Evid Based Dent; 2012; 13(3):93-4. PubMed ID: 23059930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Poor quality evidence suggests that failure rates for atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional amalgam are similar.
    Hurst D
    Evid Based Dent; 2012 Jun; 13(2):46-7. PubMed ID: 22722413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pain experience after conventional, atraumatic, and ultraconservative restorative treatments in 6- to 7-yr-old children.
    de Menezes Abreu DM; Leal SC; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Apr; 119(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 21410557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
    Smales RJ; Yip HK
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
    Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-year survival of glass ionomer sealants placed as part of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.
    Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE
    East Afr Med J; 2010 Sep; 87(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 23457815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
    Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental anxiety in 6-7-year-old children treated in accordance with conventional restorative treatment, ART and ultra-conservative treatment protocols.
    De Menezes Abreu DM; Leal SC; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):410-6. PubMed ID: 21524172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes.
    Lutz F; Krejci I
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8008818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year.
    Frencken JE; Songpaisan Y; Phantumvanit P; Pilot T
    Int Dent J; 1994 Oct; 44(5):460-4. PubMed ID: 7814116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative cost of ART and conventional treatment within a dental school clinic.
    Mickenautsch S; Munshi I; Grossman ES
    SADJ; 2002 Feb; 57(2):52-8. PubMed ID: 11921638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The safe and effective use of dental amalgam.
    Mjör IA
    Int Dent J; 1987 Sep; 37(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 3316042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment restorations and sealants under field conditions.
    Motsei SM; Kroon J; Holtshousen WS
    SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 11575114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is amalgam in child dental care on its way out? Restorative materials used in children and adolescents in 1978 and 1995 in Norway.
    Wang NJ
    Community Dent Health; 2000 Jun; 17(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 11349994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam.
    Wahl MJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):525-35. PubMed ID: 11495565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.