These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23060016)

  • 1. Differences in microbial signatures between rectal mucosal biopsies and rectal swabs.
    Araújo-Pérez F; McCoy AN; Okechukwu C; Carroll IM; Smith KM; Jeremiah K; Sandler RS; Asher GN; Keku TO
    Gut Microbes; 2012; 3(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 23060016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples.
    Fair K; Dunlap DG; Fitch A; Bogdanovich T; Methé B; Morris A; McVerry BJ; Kitsios GD
    mSphere; 2019 Jul; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31341070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Biopsy and Mucosal Swab Specimens for Examining the Microbiota of Upper Gastrointestinal Carcinoma.
    Liu AQ; Vogtmann E; Shao DT; Abnet CC; Dou HY; Qin Y; Su Z; Wei WQ; Chen W
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2019 Dec; 28(12):2030-2037. PubMed ID: 31519703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The microbiome of diabetic foot ulcers: a comparison of swab and tissue biopsy wound sampling techniques using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
    Travis J; Malone M; Hu H; Baten A; Johani K; Huygens F; Vickery K; Benkendorff K
    BMC Microbiol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):163. PubMed ID: 32546123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of rectal swab use for the determination of enteric pathogens: a prospective study of diarrhoea in adults.
    Kotar T; Pirš M; Steyer A; Cerar T; Šoba B; Skvarc M; Poljšak Prijatelj M; Lejko Zupanc T
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2019 Jun; 25(6):733-738. PubMed ID: 30315956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of bacterial community profiles from large intestine specimens, rectal swabs, and stool samples.
    Kwon YJ; Kwak HJ; Lee HK; Lim HC; Jung DH
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Dec; 105(24):9273-9284. PubMed ID: 34773153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rectal swabs for analysis of the intestinal microbiota.
    Budding AE; Grasman ME; Eck A; Bogaards JA; Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM; van Bodegraven AA; Savelkoul PH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101344. PubMed ID: 25020051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enteropathogen detection in children with diarrhoea, or vomiting, or both, comparing rectal flocked swabs with stool specimens: an outpatient cohort study.
    Freedman SB; Xie J; Nettel-Aguirre A; Lee B; Chui L; Pang XL; Zhuo R; Parsons B; Dickinson JA; Vanderkooi OG; Ali S; Osterreicher L; Lowerison K; Tarr PI;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Sep; 2(9):662-669. PubMed ID: 28712662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the robustness of inference of association with the gut microbiota in stool, rectal swab and mucosal tissue samples.
    Sun S; Zhu X; Huang X; Murff HJ; Ness RM; Seidner DL; Sorgen AA; Blakley IC; Yu C; Dai Q; Azcarate-Peril MA; Shrubsole MJ; Fodor AA
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14828. PubMed ID: 34290321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rectal swabs are a reliable method of assessing the colonic microbiome.
    Turner G; O'Grady M; Hudson D; Morgan X; Frizelle F; Purcell R
    Int J Med Microbiol; 2022 Feb; 312(2):151549. PubMed ID: 35114582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diversity of Duodenal and Rectal Microbiota in Biopsy Tissues and Luminal Contents in Healthy Volunteers.
    Li G; Yang M; Zhou K; Zhang L; Tian L; Lv S; Jin Y; Qian W; Xiong H; Lin R; Fu Y; Hou X
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Jul; 25(7):1136-45. PubMed ID: 25737115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Duodenal and rectal mucosal microbiota related to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
    Yang M; Zhang L; Hong G; Li Y; Li G; Qian W; Xiong H; Bai T; Song J; Hou X
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 May; 35(5):795-805. PubMed ID: 31674052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
    Artim SC; Sheh A; Burns MA; Fox JG
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224950. PubMed ID: 31697779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
    Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition.
    Radhakrishnan ST; Gallagher KI; Mullish BH; Serrano-Contreras JI; Alexander JL; Miguens Blanco J; Danckert NP; Valdivia-Garcia M; Hopkins BJ; Ghai A; Ayub A; Li JV; Marchesi JR; Williams HRT
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):493. PubMed ID: 36627399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usability of rectal swabs for microbiome sampling in a cohort study of hematological and oncological patients.
    Biehl LM; Garzetti D; Farowski F; Ring D; Koeppel MB; Rohde H; Schafhausen P; Stecher B; Vehreschild MJGT
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215428. PubMed ID: 30986251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tissue-Associated Bacterial Alterations in Rectal Carcinoma Patients Revealed by 16S rRNA Community Profiling.
    Thomas AM; Jesus EC; Lopes A; Aguiar S; Begnami MD; Rocha RM; Carpinetti PA; Camargo AA; Hoffmann C; Freitas HC; Silva IT; Nunes DN; Setubal JC; Dias-Neto E
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2016; 6():179. PubMed ID: 28018861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rectal swabs are a reliable proxy for faecal samples in infant gut microbiota research based on 16S-rRNA sequencing.
    Reyman M; van Houten MA; Arp K; Sanders EAM; Bogaert D
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16072. PubMed ID: 31690798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid detection and identification of Brachyspira aalborgi from rectal biopsies and faeces of a patient.
    Calderaro A; Villanacci V; Conter M; Ragni P; Piccolo G; Zuelli C; Bommezzadri S; Guégan R; Zambelli C; Perandin F; Arcangeletti MC; Medici MC; Manca N; Dettori G; Chezzi C
    Res Microbiol; 2003 Mar; 154(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 12648729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical sensitivity and specificity of the Check-Points Check-Direct ESBL Screen for BD MAX, a real-time PCR for direct ESBL detection from rectal swabs.
    Souverein D; Euser SM; van der Reijden WA; Herpers BL; Kluytmans J; Rossen JWA; Den Boer JW
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2017 Sep; 72(9):2512-2518. PubMed ID: 28633496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.