These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23061193)

  • 21. Reliability and validity testing of the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument for use in the NCSBN National Simulation Study.
    Hayden J; Keegan M; Kardong-Edgren S; Smiley RA
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2014; 35(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 25158419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity, reliability, and defensibility of assessments in veterinary education.
    Hecker K; Violato C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 19861713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of the Creighton Tool During a Home Visit Simulation Experience.
    Livsey KR
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2016; 37(5):283-284. PubMed ID: 27740562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Developing a successful nursing Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
    McWilliam P; Botwinski C
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Jan; 49(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19954138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in nursing students in Spain.
    Román-Cereto M; García-Mayor S; Kaknani-Uttumchandani S; García-Gámez M; León-Campos A; Fernández-Ordóñez E; Ruiz-García ML; Martí-García C; López-Leiva I; Lasater K; Morales-Asencio JM
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 May; 64():71-78. PubMed ID: 29459195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developing a valid and reliable Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance scale.
    Cheraghi F; Hassani P; Yaghmaei F; Alavi-Majed H
    Int Nurs Rev; 2009 Jun; 56(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 19646171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A clinical assessment tool used for physiotherapy students--is it reliable?
    Lewis LK; Stiller K; Hardy F
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2008; 24(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 18432515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The National League for Nursing Project to Explore the Use of Simulation for High-Stakes Assessment: Process, Outcomes, and Recommendations.
    Rizzolo MA; Kardong-Edgren S; Oermann MH; Jeffries PR
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 26521498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing self-guided learning and educator-guided learning formats for simulation-based clinical training.
    Brydges R; Carnahan H; Rose D; Dubrowski A
    J Adv Nurs; 2010 Aug; 66(8):1832-44. PubMed ID: 20557388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal with BSN students.
    Frye B; Alfred N; Campbell M
    Nurs Health Care Perspect; 1999; 20(5):253-5. PubMed ID: 10754848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: Implications for Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness.
    Lee KC
    J Nurs Educ; 2021 Feb; 60(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 33528576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of the Simulation Effectiveness Tool in Nursing Education.
    Shin H; Kim H; Rim D; Ma H; Shon S
    J Nurs Educ; 2020 Apr; 59(4):186-193. PubMed ID: 32243549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability and validity of a scoring instrument for clinical performance during Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation scenarios.
    Donoghue A; Nishisaki A; Sutton R; Hales R; Boulet J
    Resuscitation; 2010 Mar; 81(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 20047787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Integrating simulated teaching/learning strategies in undergraduate nursing education.
    Sinclair B; Ferguson K
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2009; 6():Article7. PubMed ID: 19341357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Student evaluation of a standardized comprehensive testing program.
    Richards EA; Stone CL
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2008; 29(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 19244803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rater Bias in Simulation Performance Assessment: Examining the Effect of Participant Race/Ethnicity.
    Adamson K
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2016; 37(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 27209865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rescuing A Patient In Deteriorating Situations (RAPIDS): A simulation-based educational program on recognizing, responding and reporting of physiological signs of deterioration.
    Liaw SY; Rethans JJ; Scherpbier A; Piyanee KY
    Resuscitation; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1224-30. PubMed ID: 21664026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Theory-based research of high fidelity simulation use in nursing education: a review of the literature.
    Rourke L; Schmidt M; Garga N
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2010; 7():Article11. PubMed ID: 20361859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computerized clinical simulations: a strategy for staff development in critical care.
    Henry SB; Waltmire D
    Am J Crit Care; 1992 Sep; 1(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 1307897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using the analytic rubric as an evaluation tool in nursing education: the positive and the negative.
    Shipman D; Roa M; Hooten J; Wang ZJ
    Nurse Educ Today; 2012 Apr; 32(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 21571406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.