These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23061997)
1. Flap-off epi-LASIK versus automated epithelial brush in PRK: a prospective comparison study of pain and reepithelialization times. Magone MT; Engle AT; Easter TH; Stanley PF; Howells J; Pasternak JF J Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 28(10):682-9. PubMed ID: 23061997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia. Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical investigation of off-flap epi-LASIK for moderate to high myopia. Wang QM; Fu AC; Yu Y; Xu CC; Wang XX; Chen SH; Yu AY Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2390-4. PubMed ID: 18515581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual outcomes after Epi-LASIK and PRK for low and moderate myopia. Sia RK; Coe CD; Edwards JD; Ryan DS; Bower KS J Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 28(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 21985667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of flap removal in myopic epi-LASIK surgery on visual rehabilitation and postoperative pain: a prospective intraindividual study. Na KS; Lee KM; Park SH; Lee HS; Joo CK Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 20431312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Tear cytokines and clinical outcomes between off-flap and on-flap epi-LASIK with mitomycin C. Zhang Y; Chen YG; Xia YJ; Qi H J Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 28(9):632-8. PubMed ID: 22947291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopic findings between epi-LASIK procedures with different management of the epithelial flaps. Chen WL; Shen EP; Hsieh YT; Yeh PT; Wang TJ; Hu FR Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(6):3640-7. PubMed ID: 21357404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of repositioning or discarding the epithelial flap in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis. Taneri S; Oehler S; Koch J; Azar D J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1832-46. PubMed ID: 21930046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epithelial healing and clinical outcomes in excimer laser photorefractive surgery following three epithelial removal techniques: mechanical, alcohol, and excimer laser. Lee HK; Lee KS; Kim JK; Kim HC; Seo KR; Kim EK Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 15652828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia. El-Maghraby A; Salah T; Waring GO; Klyce S; Ibrahim O Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 10080199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group. Steinert RF; Hersh PS Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of postoperative pain in patients following photorefractive keratectomy versus advanced surface ablation. Blake CR; Cervantes-Castañeda RA; Macias-Rodríguez Y; Anzoulatous G; Anderson R; Chayet AS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1314-9. PubMed ID: 16105600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral comparison of conventional epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis and lamellar epithelial debridement for moderate to high myopia. Kim JH; Lim T; Lee HG; Kim JY; Kim MJ; Tchah H Cornea; 2010 Aug; 29(8):853-7. PubMed ID: 20508509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Masked comparison of silicone hydrogel lotrafilcon A and etafilcon A extended-wear bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy. Engle AT; Laurent JM; Schallhorn SC; Toman SD; Newacheck JS; Tanzer DJ; Tidwell JL J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Apr; 31(4):681-6. PubMed ID: 15899442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wavefront-guided epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis with mitomycin-C for myopia and myopic astigmatism: flap-on versus flap-off technique. Ang RE; Reyes KB; Hernandez JA; Tchah H J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jun; 37(6):1133-9. PubMed ID: 21596257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism. Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]