782 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23062143)
1. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.
Gracis S; Michalakis K; Vigolo P; Vult von Steyern P; Zwahlen M; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():202-16. PubMed ID: 23062143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of the influence of the implant-abutment connection on the clinical outcomes of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions.
Pjetursson BE; Zarauz C; Strasding M; Sailer I; Zwahlen M; Zembic A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 18():160-183. PubMed ID: 30306682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Evaluation of the Influence of Connection Type and Restoration Height on the Reliability of Zirconia Abutments: A Retrospective Study on 965 Abutments with a Mean 6-Year Follow-Up.
Fabbri G; Fradeani M; Dellificorelli G; De Lorenzi M; Zarone F; Sorrentino R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2017; 37(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 27977814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consensus report - reconstructions on implants. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012.
Gotfredsen K; Wiskott A;
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():238-41. PubMed ID: 23062146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Caricasulo R; Malchiodi L; Ghensi P; Fantozzi G; Cucchi A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):653-664. PubMed ID: 29761902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry.
Morton D; Gallucci G; Lin WS; Pjetursson B; Polido W; Roehling S; Sailer I; Aghaloo T; Albera H; Bohner L; Braut V; Buser D; Chen S; Dawson A; Eckert S; Gahlert M; Hamilton A; Jaffin R; Jarry C; Karayazgan B; Laine J; Martin W; Rahman L; Schlegel A; Shiota M; Stilwell C; Vorster C; Zembic A; Zhou W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():215-223. PubMed ID: 30328196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Bonfante EA; Santiago Júnior JF; Pellizzer EP
J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():14-22. PubMed ID: 29221955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result.
Beuer F; Sachs C; Groesser J; Gueth JF; Stimmelmayr M
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1079-86. PubMed ID: 26399980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture of Zirconia Abutments in Implant Treatments: A Systematic Review.
Gou M; Chen H; Fu M; Wang H
Implant Dent; 2019 Aug; 28(4):378-387. PubMed ID: 31344017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internal- vs External-Connection Single Implants: A Retrospective Study in an Italian Population Treated by Certified Prosthodontists.
Vigolo P; Gracis S; Carboncini F; Mutinelli S;
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1385-1396. PubMed ID: 27861666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions--a systematic review.
Wittneben JG; Millen C; Brägger U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():84-98. PubMed ID: 24660192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Original vs. Non-Original Abutments Using Various Connection Geometries for Single Unit Restorations: A Systematic Review.
Rizvi N; Alyahya Y; Rizvi A; Narvekar U; Petridis H
J Prosthodont; 2022 Aug; 31(7):e21-e52. PubMed ID: 34866275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
