These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23062240)

  • 1. QSAR study for carcinogenicity in a large set of organic compounds.
    Duchowicz PR; Comelli NC; Ortiz EV; Castro EA
    Curr Drug Saf; 2012 Sep; 7(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 23062240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QSAR modelling of carcinogenicity by balance of correlations.
    Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Benfenati E; Manganaro A
    Mol Divers; 2009 Aug; 13(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 19190994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity by machine learning approaches.
    Tan NX; Rao HB; Li ZR; Li XY
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009; 20(1-2):27-75. PubMed ID: 19343583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of a robust QSAR model for prediction of carcinogenicity of drugs.
    Kar S; Roy K
    Indian J Biochem Biophys; 2011 Apr; 48(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21682143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using molecular structural similarity and E-state indices.
    Contrera JF; Matthews EJ; Daniel Benz R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Dec; 38(3):243-59. PubMed ID: 14623477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CORAL: QSAR models for carcinogenicity of organic compounds for male and female rats.
    Toropova AP; Toropov AA
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Feb; 72():26-32. PubMed ID: 29310001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A radial-distribution-function approach for predicting rodent carcinogenicity.
    Morales AH; Cabrera Pérez MA; González MP
    J Mol Model; 2006 Sep; 12(6):769-80. PubMed ID: 16421721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First report on development of quantitative interspecies structure-carcinogenicity relationship models and exploring discriminatory features for rodent carcinogenicity of diverse organic chemicals using OECD guidelines.
    Kar S; Roy K
    Chemosphere; 2012 Apr; 87(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 22225702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Monte Carlo technique as a tool to predict LOAEL.
    Veselinović JB; Veselinović AM; Toropova AP; Toropov AA
    Eur J Med Chem; 2016 Jun; 116():71-75. PubMed ID: 27060758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of carcinogenicity for diverse chemicals based on substructure grouping and SVM modeling.
    Tanabe K; Lučić B; Amić D; Kurita T; Kaihara M; Onodera N; Suzuki T
    Mol Divers; 2010 Nov; 14(4):789-802. PubMed ID: 20186479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
    Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
    Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency.
    Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ecotoxicological QSAR modeling of organic compounds against fish: Application of fragment based descriptors in feature analysis.
    Khan K; Baderna D; Cappelli C; Toma C; Lombardo A; Roy K; Benfenati E
    Aquat Toxicol; 2019 Jul; 212():162-174. PubMed ID: 31128417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. QSAR Study for Carcinogenic Potency of Aromatic Amines Based on GEP and MLPs.
    Song F; Zhang A; Liang H; Cui L; Li W; Si H; Duan Y; Zhai H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27854309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modelling of the carcinogenic risk of nitroso compounds using regression analysis and the TOPS-MODE approach.
    Helguera AM; Pérez-Machado G; Cordeiro MN; Combes RD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Apr; 21(3-4):277-304. PubMed ID: 20544552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. QSAR on antiproliferative naphthoquinones based on a conformation-independent approach.
    Duchowicz PR; Bennardi DO; Bacelo DE; Bonifazi EL; Rios-Luci C; Padrón JM; Burton G; Misico RI
    Eur J Med Chem; 2014 Apr; 77():176-84. PubMed ID: 24631897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
    Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A topological substructural approach applied to the computational prediction of rodent carcinogenicity.
    Helguera AM; Cabrera Pérez MA; González MP; Ruiz RM; González Díaz H
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 13(7):2477-88. PubMed ID: 15755650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential carcinogenicity predicted by computational toxicity evaluation of thiophosphate pesticides using QSTR/QSCarciAR model.
    Petrescu AM; Ilia G
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 40(3):263-272. PubMed ID: 27461057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.