297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23063157)
1. Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes.
VanRaden PM; Null DJ; Sargolzaei M; Wiggans GR; Tooker ME; Cole JB; Sonstegard TS; Connor EE; Winters M; van Kaam JB; Valentini A; Van Doormaal BJ; Faust MA; Doak GA
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):668-78. PubMed ID: 23063157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the Illumina Bovine3K BeadChip in dairy genomic evaluation.
Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Vanraden PM; Olson KM; Tooker ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Mar; 95(3):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22365235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips.
Segelke D; Chen J; Liu Z; Reinhardt F; Thaller G; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5403-5411. PubMed ID: 22916947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.
Su G; Brøndum RF; Ma P; Guldbrandtsen B; Aamand GP; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4657-65. PubMed ID: 22818480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.
Piccoli ML; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Larmer SG; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2014 Dec; 15():157. PubMed ID: 25543517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marker selection and genomic prediction of economically important traits using imputed high-density genotypes for 5 breeds of dairy cattle.
Al-Khudhair A; VanRaden PM; Null DJ; Li B
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4478-4485. PubMed ID: 33612229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips.
Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confirmation and discovery of maternal grandsires and great-grandsires in dairy cattle.
VanRaden PM; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; O'Connell JR; Bacheller LR
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1874-9. PubMed ID: 23332849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.
Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the limited increase in validation reliability using high-density genotypes in genomic best linear unbiased prediction: observations from Fleckvieh cattle.
Ertl J; Edel C; Emmerling R; Pausch H; Fries R; Götz KU
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):487-96. PubMed ID: 24210491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing imputation and prediction accuracy for Chinese Holsteins using joint Chinese-Nordic reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Ding X; Zhang Q; Su G
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Dec; 131(6):462-72. PubMed ID: 25099946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short communication: Imputation performances of 3 low-density marker panels in beef and dairy cattle.
Dassonneville R; Fritz S; Ducrocq V; Boichard D
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4136-40. PubMed ID: 22720970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.
Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategies for genotype imputation in composite beef cattle.
Chud TC; Ventura RV; Schenkel FS; Carvalheiro R; Buzanskas ME; Rosa JO; Mudadu Mde A; da Silva MV; Mokry FB; Marcondes CR; Regitano LC; Munari DP
BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():99. PubMed ID: 26250698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
