These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23063216)

  • 1. Resisting the seduction of "ethics creep": using Foucault to surface complexity and contradiction in research ethics review.
    Guta A; Nixon SA; Wilson MG
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Dec; 98():301-10. PubMed ID: 23063216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Walking along beside the researcher": how Canadian REBs/IRBs are responding to the needs of community-based participatory research.
    Guta A; Nixon S; Gahagan J; Fielden S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Feb; 7(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 22378131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships between community-based processes for research ethics review and institution-based IRBs: a national study.
    Shore N; Drew E; Brazauskas R; Seifer SD
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Jun; 6(2):13-21. PubMed ID: 21680973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are we asking the right questions? A review of Canadian REB practices in relation to community-based participatory research.
    Guta A; Wilson MG; Flicker S; Travers R; Mason C; Wenyeve G; O'Campo P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Jun; 5(2):35-46. PubMed ID: 20569148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
    Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
    Elsayed DE; Kass NE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity.
    Mielke J; Ndebele P
    Cent Afr J Med; 2004; 50(11-12):115-9. PubMed ID: 16615661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system.
    McWilliams R; Hebden CW; Gilpin AM
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 16770858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protecting vulnerable research participants: a Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees.
    Juritzen TI; Grimen H; Heggen K
    Nurs Ethics; 2011 Sep; 18(5):640-50. PubMed ID: 21646327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research ethics boards--operational issues I.
    Lynch A
    NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 15540381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extending the olive branch.
    McMurphy S; Lewis J; Boulos P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Oct; 8(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 24169419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Satisfaction and Use of Research Ethics Board Information Systems in Canada.
    Detlor B; Wilson MJ
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 26306507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In court: research subjects says institutional review boards (IRBs) must change research review.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):8. PubMed ID: 16789307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research oversight through new lenses: the consortium to examine clinical research ethics.
    Sugarman J; Eckenwiler LA; Emanuel EJ
    IRB; 2003; 25(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 12833899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
    Meslin EM
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics creep or governance creep? Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECS).
    Gorman SM
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2011 Sep; 29(4):14.1-16. PubMed ID: 22397089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Debate over institutional review boards continues as alternative options emerge.
    McNeil C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Apr; 99(7):502-3. PubMed ID: 17405992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. IRBs and financial conflict of interest.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Nov; 16(11):3. PubMed ID: 11883459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics committees in Asia.
    de Castro LD
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):120-2. PubMed ID: 15282929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.