BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23064000)

  • 1. A counting renaissance: combining stochastic mapping and empirical Bayes to quickly detect amino acid sites under positive selection.
    Lemey P; Minin VN; Bielejec F; Kosakovsky Pond SL; Suchard MA
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Dec; 28(24):3248-56. PubMed ID: 23064000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection.
    Kosakovsky Pond SL; Frost SD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1208-22. PubMed ID: 15703242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting Adaptation in Protein-Coding Genes Using a Bayesian Site-Heterogeneous Mutation-Selection Codon Substitution Model.
    Rodrigue N; Lartillot N
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Jan; 34(1):204-214. PubMed ID: 27744408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying sites under positive selection with uncertain parameter estimates.
    Aris-Brosou S
    Genome; 2006 Jul; 49(7):767-76. PubMed ID: 16936785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why time matters: codon evolution and the temporal dynamics of dN/dS.
    Mugal CF; Wolf JB; Kaj I
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jan; 31(1):212-31. PubMed ID: 24129904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extensively Parameterized Mutation-Selection Models Reliably Capture Site-Specific Selective Constraint.
    Spielman SJ; Wilke CO
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):2990-3002. PubMed ID: 27512115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting positive and purifying selection at synonymous sites in yeast and worm.
    Zhou T; Gu W; Wilke CO
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Aug; 27(8):1912-22. PubMed ID: 20231333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smoothed Bootstrap Aggregation for Assessing Selection Pressure at Amino Acid Sites.
    Mingrone J; Susko E; Bielawski J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):2976-2989. PubMed ID: 27486222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The site-wise log-likelihood score is a good predictor of genes under positive selection.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    J Mol Evol; 2013 May; 76(5):280-94. PubMed ID: 23595859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporation of transition to transversion ratio and nonsense mutations, improves the estimation of the number of synonymous and non-synonymous sites in codons.
    Aziz R; Sen P; Beura PK; Das S; Tula D; Dash M; Namsa ND; Deka RC; Feil EJ; Satapathy SS; Ray SK
    DNA Res; 2022 Jun; 29(4):. PubMed ID: 35920776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian estimation of positively selected sites.
    Huelsenbeck JP; Dyer KA
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Jun; 58(6):661-72. PubMed ID: 15461423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shifting Balance on a Static Mutation-Selection Landscape: A Novel Scenario of Positive Selection.
    Jones CT; Youssef N; Susko E; Bielawski JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Feb; 34(2):391-407. PubMed ID: 28110273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y; Gojobori T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):1315-28. PubMed ID: 10563013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kr/Kc but not dN/dS correlates positively with body mass in birds, raising implications for inferring lineage-specific selection.
    Weber CC; Nabholz B; Romiguier J; Ellegren H
    Genome Biol; 2014; 15(12):542. PubMed ID: 25607475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Jul; 59(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 15383903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between dN/dS and scaled selection coefficients.
    Spielman SJ; Wilke CO
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Apr; 32(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 25576365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
    Scheffler K; Seoighe C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The roles of positive and negative selection in the molecular evolution of insect endosymbionts.
    Fry AJ; Wernegreen JJ
    Gene; 2005 Aug; 355():1-10. PubMed ID: 16039807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Methods to Detect Shifts in Directional Selection at the Genome Scale.
    Duchemin L; Lanore V; Veber P; Boussau B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Feb; 40(2):. PubMed ID: 36510704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of site-specific positive Darwinian selection on pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus genome: integrative approaches.
    Arunachalam R
    Genetica; 2013 Jun; 141(4-6):143-55. PubMed ID: 23529677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.