140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23064024)
1. How to increase uptake in oncologic screening: a systematic review of studies comparing population-based screening programs and spontaneous access.
Ferroni E; Camilloni L; Jimenez B; Furnari G; Borgia P; Guasticchi G; Giorgi Rossi P;
Prev Med; 2012 Dec; 55(6):587-96. PubMed ID: 23064024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.
Camilloni L; Ferroni E; Cendales BJ; Pezzarossi A; Furnari G; Borgia P; Guasticchi G; Giorgi Rossi P;
BMC Public Health; 2013 May; 13():464. PubMed ID: 23663511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Invitation coverage and participation in Italian cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening programmes.
Giorgi Rossi P; Carrozzi G; Federici A; Mancuso P; Sampaolo L; Zappa M
J Med Screen; 2018 Mar; 25(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 28614991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Methods to increase participation in cancer screening programmes].
Giorgi Rossi P; Camilloni L; Cogo C; Federici A; Ferroni E; Furnari G; Giordano L; Grazzini G; Iossa A; Jimenez B; Palazzi M; Palazzo F; Spadea T; Senore C; Borgia P; Guasticchi G
Epidemiol Prev; 2012 Jan; 36(1 Suppl 1):1-104. PubMed ID: 22418841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Promoting participation in a population screening program for breast and cervical cancer: a randomized trial of different invitation strategies.
Segnan N; Senore C; Giordano L; Ponti A; Ronco G
Tumori; 1998; 84(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 9678615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening interventions in older women.
Bowie JV; Curbow BA; Garza MA; Dreyling EK; Benz Scott LA; McDonnell KA
Cancer Control; 2005 Nov; 12 Suppl 2():58-69. PubMed ID: 16327752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.
Decker KM; Turner D; Demers AA; Martens PJ; Lambert P; Chateau D
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Aug; 22(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 23915107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.
Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.
Sabatino SA; Lawrence B; Elder R; Mercer SL; Wilson KM; DeVinney B; Melillo S; Carvalho M; Taplin S; Bastani R; Rimer BK; Vernon SW; Melvin CL; Taylor V; Fernandez M; Glanz K;
Am J Prev Med; 2012 Jul; 43(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 22704754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Coverage: A Randomised, Community-Based Clinical Trial.
Acera A; Manresa JM; Rodriguez D; Rodriguez A; Bonet JM; Trapero-Bertran M; Hidalgo P; Sànchez N; de Sanjosé S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170371. PubMed ID: 28118410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer Screening on the Hopi Reservation: A Model for Success in a Native American Community.
Brown SR; Joshweseoma L; Saboda K; Sanderson P; Ami D; Harris R
J Community Health; 2015 Dec; 40(6):1165-72. PubMed ID: 26091896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. History, development and future of cancer screening in Australia.
Olver IN; Roder D
Public Health Res Pract; 2017 Jul; 27(3):. PubMed ID: 28765858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determinants of Population-Based Cancer Screening Performance at Primary Healthcare Institutions in China.
Zheng S; Zhang X; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH; Lu W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 33806890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between age factors and strategies for promoting participation in gastric and colorectal cancer screenings.
Hamashima C; Sano H
BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):345. PubMed ID: 29587681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the United States.
Escoffery C; Rodgers KC; Kegler MC; Haardörfer R; Howard DH; Liang S; Pinsker E; Roland KB; Allen JD; Ory MG; Bastani R; Fernandez ME; Risendal BC; Byrd TL; Coronado GD
BMC Public Health; 2014 Mar; 14():274. PubMed ID: 24661503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Updated recommendations for client- and provider-oriented interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.
Community Preventive Services Task Force
Am J Prev Med; 2012 Jul; 43(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 22704753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary care characteristics and their association with health screening in a low-socioeconomic status public rental-flat population in Singapore- a mixed methods study.
Wee LE; Cher WQ; Sin D; Li ZC; Koh GC
BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Feb; 17():16. PubMed ID: 26851939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intervention to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers a systematic review of provider reminders.
Baron RC; Melillo S; Rimer BK; Coates RJ; Kerner J; Habarta N; Chattopadhyay S; Sabatino SA; Elder R; Leeks KJ;
Am J Prev Med; 2010 Jan; 38(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 20117566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Study on the coverage of cervical and breast cancer screening among women aged 35-69 years and related impact of socioeconomic factors in China, 2013].
Bao HL; Wang LH; Wang LM; Fang LW; Zhang M; Zhao ZP; Cong S
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 39(2):208-212. PubMed ID: 29495207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]