These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23064247)

  • 1. Personal circumstances and social characteristics as determinants of landholder participation in biodiversity conservation programs.
    Moon K; Marshall N; Cocklin C
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():292-300. PubMed ID: 23064247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A landholder-based approach to the design of private-land conservation programs.
    Moon K; Cocklin C
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):493-503. PubMed ID: 21309851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social factors and private benefits influence landholders' riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia.
    Januchowski-Hartley SR; Moon K; Stoeckl N; Gray S
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():20-6. PubMed ID: 22705856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions.
    Raymond CM; Brown G
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2513-23. PubMed ID: 21664035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maintaining landholder satisfaction and management of private protected areas established under conservation agreements.
    Groce JE; Cook CN
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 305():114355. PubMed ID: 34953226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Program Awareness, Social Capital, and Perceptions of Trees Influence Participation in Private Land Conservation Programs in Queensland, Australia.
    Simmons BA; Archibald CL; Wilson KA; Dean AJ
    Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 66(3):289-304. PubMed ID: 32588074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding why landholders choose to participate or withdraw from conservation programs: a case study from a Queensland conservation auction.
    Comerford E
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Aug; 141():169-76. PubMed ID: 24815578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Landholder typologies illuminate pathways for social change in a deforestation hotspot.
    Simmons BA; Wilson KA; Dean AJ
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jan; 254():109777. PubMed ID: 31733476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of using feasibility models in systematic conservation planning to predict landholder management uptake.
    Tulloch AI; Tulloch VJ; Evans MC; Mills M
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1462-73. PubMed ID: 25382827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public policy, private landholders: perspectives on policy mechanisms for sustainable land management.
    Cocklin C; Mautner N; Dibden J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Dec; 85(4):986-98. PubMed ID: 17208349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Private land manager capacity to conserve threatened communities under climate change.
    Raymond CM; Lechner AM; Lockwood M; Carter O; Harris RMB; Gilfedder L
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Aug; 159():235-244. PubMed ID: 26067646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determinants of field edge habitat restoration on farms in California's Sacramento Valley.
    Garbach K; Long RF
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 189():134-141. PubMed ID: 28012388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of cognitive processes on rural landholder responses to climate change.
    Rogers M; Curtis A; Mazur N
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 111():258-66. PubMed ID: 22982250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Devising appropriate policies and instruments in support of private conservation areas: lessons learned from the Klein Karoo, South Africa.
    Pasquini L; Cowling RM; Twyman C; Wainwright J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):470-8. PubMed ID: 19843125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental Management in the Peri-urban Region: Psychological and Contextual Factors Influencing Private Land Conservation Actions.
    Uebel K; Rhodes J; Wilson KA; Dean AJ
    Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 68(2):184-197. PubMed ID: 34125266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program.
    Sorice MG; Haider W; Conner JR; Ditton RB
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):587-96. PubMed ID: 21488955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychosocial drivers of land management behaviour: How threats, norms, and context influence deforestation intentions.
    Simmons BA; Wilson KA; Dean AJ
    Ambio; 2021 Jul; 50(7):1364-1377. PubMed ID: 33496942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A case study of landholder attitudes and behaviour toward the conservation of renosterveld, a critically endangered vegetation type in Cape Floral Kingdom, South Africa.
    Winter SJ; Prozesky H; Esler KJ
    Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 40(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17530328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions and attitudes of land managers in multi-tenure reserve networks and the implications for conservation.
    Fitzsimons JA; Wescott G
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 16904814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.
    Sorice MG; Oh CO; Gartner T; Snieckus M; Johnson R; Donlan CJ
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1146-55. PubMed ID: 23967582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.