These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23064521)
1. Top-down versus bottom-up: when instructions overcome automatic retrieval. Waszak F; Pfister R; Kiesel A Psychol Res; 2013 Sep; 77(5):611-7. PubMed ID: 23064521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The contribution of stimulus frequency and recency to set-size effects. van 't Wout F Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1123-1128. PubMed ID: 29209942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files. Dignath D; Johannsen L; Hommel B; Kiesel A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1265-1270. PubMed ID: 31380673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions. Meiran N; Pereg M Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 28219260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Caudate Nucleus Mediates Learning of Stimulus-Control State Associations. Chiu YC; Jiang J; Egner T J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):1028-1038. PubMed ID: 28123033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dopamine D1, but not D2, signaling protects mental representations from distracting bottom-up influences. Bensmann W; Zink N; Arning L; Beste C; Stock AK Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 204():116243. PubMed ID: 31610297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval. Ciaramelli E; Grady CL; Moscovitch M Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1828-51. PubMed ID: 18471837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disentangling inhibition-based and retrieval-based aftereffects of distractors: Cognitive versus motor processes. Singh T; Laub R; Burgard JP; Frings C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):797-805. PubMed ID: 29154633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence of task-triggered retrieval of the previous response: a binding perspective on response-repetition benefits in task switching. Benini E; Möller M; Koch I; Philipp AM; Qiu R; Mayr S Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1290-1300. PubMed ID: 37957478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes. Singh T; Moeller B; Frings C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 27631631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of alerting signals in action control: activation of S-R associations or inhibition of executive control processes? Fischer R; Plessow F; Kiesel A Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 21667175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Top-down task goals induce the retrieval state. Smith DE; Long NM J Neurosci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38926086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Across-task long-term priming: interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval. Waszak F Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1414-29. PubMed ID: 20043270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming]. Martin S; Brouillet D; Guerdoux E; Tarrago R Encephale; 2006; 32(2 Pt 1):253-62. PubMed ID: 16910627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]