These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23064967)

  • 1. Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position.
    Yatabe T; Kitagawa H; Yamashita K; Hanazaki K; Yokoyama M
    Surg Today; 2013 Apr; 43(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 23064967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prone position in thoracoscopic esophagectomy improves postoperative oxygenation and reduces pulmonary complications.
    Otsubo D; Nakamura T; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Kanemitsu K; Yamashita K; Imanishi T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Suzuki S; Kuroda D; Kakeji Y
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 27387180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of short-term outcomes between prone and lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Teshima J; Miyata G; Kamei T; Nakano T; Abe S; Katsura K; Taniyama Y; Sakurai T; Hikage M; Nakamura T; Takaya K; Zuguchi M; Okamoto H; Youhei O; Ohuchi N
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2756-62. PubMed ID: 25480621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in decubitus position with prone position].
    FENG MX; TAN LJ; WANG H; LIANG MQ; ZHANG Y; SHEN YX; WANG Q
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 14(9):686-8. PubMed ID: 21948532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thoracoscopic and hand assisted laparoscopic esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the left lateral decubitus position: a single center retrospective analysis of 654 patients.
    Murakami M; Otsuka K; Goto S; Ariyoshi T; Yamashita T; Aoki T
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Nov; 17(1):748. PubMed ID: 29126387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position with laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer.
    Kitagawa H; Namikawa T; Munekage M; Fujisawa K; Munekgae E; Kobayashi M; Hanazaki K
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 Aug; 401(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 27225750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions.
    Fabian T; Martin J; Katigbak M; McKelvey AA; Federico JA
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Nov; 22(11):2485-91. PubMed ID: 18320278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
    Dapri G; Himpens J; Cadière GB
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):1060-9. PubMed ID: 18071806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Tanaka E; Okabe H; Kinjo Y; Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Sakai Y
    Surg Today; 2015 Jul; 45(7):819-25. PubMed ID: 25387656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning.
    Yatabe T; Kitagawa H; Yamashita K; Akimori T; Hanazaki K; Yokoyama M
    J Anesth; 2010 Oct; 24(5):803-6. PubMed ID: 20526722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of perioperative and oncological outcome of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in left decubitus position and in prone position for esophageal cancer.
    Kuwabara S; Kobayashi K; Kubota A; Shioi I; Yamaguchi K; Katayanagi N
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Aug; 403(5):607-614. PubMed ID: 29656329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of the postural transition in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Tanishima Y; Nishikawa K; Ishikawa Y; Takahashi K; Masuda T; Kurogochi T; Yuda M; Tanaka Y; Matsumoto A; Yano F; Mitsumori N; Ikegami T
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3947-3956. PubMed ID: 34494153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Kitagawa H; Namikawa T; Iwabu J; Fujisawa K; Kobayashi M; Hanazaki K
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Dec; 402(8):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 29116434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for esophageal cancer with the patient in prone position.
    Petri R; Zuccolo M; Brizzolari M; Rossit L; Rosignoli A; Durastante V; Petrin G; De Cecchis L; Sorrentino M
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1102-7. PubMed ID: 22042593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Kaburagi T; Takeuchi H; Kawakubo H; Omori T; Ozawa S; Kitagawa Y
    World J Surg; 2014 Feb; 38(2):410-8. PubMed ID: 24101023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is associated with less-restrictive ventilatory impairment and less risk for pulmonary complication than open laparotomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Oshikiri T; Yasuda T; Kawasaki K; Harada H; Oyama M; Hasegawa H; Ohara T; Sendo H; Nakamura T; Fujino Y; Tominaga M; Kakeji Y
    Surgery; 2016 Feb; 159(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 26361833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thoracoscopy in prone position with two-lung ventilation compared to conventional thoracotomy during Ivor Lewis procedure: a multicenter case-control study.
    Souche R; Nayeri M; Chati R; Huet E; Donici I; Tuech JJ; Borie F; Prudhomme M; Jaber S; Fabre JM
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):142-152. PubMed ID: 30868323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.
    Kanekiyo S; Takeda S; Tsutsui M; Nishiyama M; Kitahara M; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Tomochika S; Tokuhisa Y; Iida M; Sakamoto K; Suzuki N; Yamamoto S; Yoshino S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1945-1953. PubMed ID: 29075967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of the short-term outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via thoracoscopy in left lateral position and in prone position].
    Hou YL; Zhao JQ; Guo W; Zang B; Tang DR
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 15(9):950-3. PubMed ID: 22990931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of thoracic cage width in assessing surgical difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy in left lateral decubitus position.
    Takeno S; Tanoue Y; Hamada R; Kawano F; Tashiro K; Wada T; Ikenoue M; Nanashima A; Nakamura K
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3479-3486. PubMed ID: 31576442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.