BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23064974)

  • 1. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang D; Künzel A; Golubovic V; Mihatovic I; John G; Chen Z; Becker J; Schwarz F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1601-9. PubMed ID: 23064974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. More about accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang D; Künzel A; Golubovic V; Mihatovic I; John G; Chen Z; Becker J; Schwarz F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1787-8. PubMed ID: 23430341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography--is this correct?
    Sabour S; Dastjerdi EV; Moezizadeh M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1785. PubMed ID: 23430340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation.
    Buser D; Chappuis V; Kuchler U; Bornstein MM; Wittneben JG; Buser R; Cavusoglu Y; Belser UC
    J Dent Res; 2013 Dec; 92(12 Suppl):176S-82S. PubMed ID: 24158332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs. block xenogenic bone substitutes: a pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation.
    Benic GI; Thoma DS; Jung RE; Sanz-Martin I; Unger S; Cantalapiedra A; Hämmerle CHF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):e262-e270. PubMed ID: 28378530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vertical ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration in association with dental implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Simion M; Dahlin C; Rocchietta I; Stavropoulos A; Sanchez R; Karring T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 17224028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of postoperative labial bone thickness in maxillary anterior implants: comparing immediate and delayed implant placement.
    Miyamoto Y; Obama T
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Jun; 31(3):215-25. PubMed ID: 21556378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome of implant therapy involving localised lateral alveolar ridge and/or sinus floor augmentation: a clinical and radiographic retrospective 1-year study.
    Hansen EJ; Schou S; Harder F; Hjorting-Hansen E
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 22043469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery: I. Clinical and radiographic parameters.
    Fu JH; Oh TJ; Benavides E; Rudek I; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):458-67. PubMed ID: 23594026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous or staged installation with guided bone augmentation of transmucosal titanium implants. A 3-year prospective cohort study.
    Christensen DK; Karoussis IK; Joss A; Hämmerle CH; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Dec; 14(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 15015942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous implant placement and bone grafting with particulate mineralized allograft in sites with buccal wall defects, a three-year follow-up and review of literature.
    Le BT; Borzabadi-Farahani A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 24529349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant Site Under-Preparation to Compensate the Remodeling of an Autologous Bone Block Graft.
    Anitua E; Murias-Freijo A; Alkhraisat MH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):e374-7. PubMed ID: 26167993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with soft-type block versus particulate bone substitutes: Six-month results of hard-tissue changes.
    Benic GI; Bienz SP; Song YW; Cha JK; Hämmerle CHF; Jung UW; Jung RE
    J Clin Periodontol; 2022 May; 49(5):480-495. PubMed ID: 35191065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
    Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium mesh: a three-dimensional evaluation of factors affecting bone augmentation.
    Lizio G; Corinaldesi G; Marchetti C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1354-63. PubMed ID: 25397798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.
    Tang YL; Yuan J; Song YL; Ma W; Chao X; Li DH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 24330035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?
    Aghaloo TL; Moy PK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():49-70. PubMed ID: 18437791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Osseointegration in Implants using Digital Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Chopra A; Mhapuskar AA; Marathe S; Nisa SU; Thopte S; Saddiwal R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):953-957. PubMed ID: 27965508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.