280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23065168)
1. Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques.
Mohaghegh P; Rockall AG
Radiographics; 2012 Oct; 32(6):1751-73. PubMed ID: 23065168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Imaoka I; Wada A; Kaji Y; Hayashi T; Hayashi M; Matsuo M; Sugimura K
Radiographics; 2006; 26(5):1431-48. PubMed ID: 16973774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of pelvic masses in women: contrast-enhanced vs unenhanced images.
Thurnher SA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Dec; 159(6):1243-50. PubMed ID: 1442393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging.
Sohaib SA; Sahdev A; Van Trappen P; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 May; 180(5):1297-304. PubMed ID: 12704041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ovarian lesions: detection and characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Stevens SK; Hricak H; Stern JL
Radiology; 1991 Nov; 181(2):481-8. PubMed ID: 1924792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of malignant from benign pheochromocytomas with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance at 3.0 T.
Dong Y; Liu Q
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 22805661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses.
Huber S; Medl M; Baumann L; Czembirek H
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2501-7. PubMed ID: 12174952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging--multivariate analysis.
Hricak H; Chen M; Coakley FV; Kinkel K; Yu KK; Sica G; Bacchetti P; Powell CB
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 10644099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation between malignant and benign ovarian tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.
Chen M; Wang WC; Zhou C; Zhou NN; Cai K; Yang ZH; Zhao WF; Li SY; Li GZ
Chin Med Sci J; 2006 Dec; 21(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17249204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving risk stratification of indeterminate adnexal masses on MRI: What imaging features help predict malignancy in O-RADS MRI 4 lesions?
Wong BZY; Causa Andrieu PI; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki EM; Vargas HA; Woo S
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111122. PubMed ID: 37806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: a review.
Bazot M; Daraï E; Nassar-Slaba J; Lafont C; Thomassin-Naggara I
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(5):712-23. PubMed ID: 18830100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update.
Forstner R; Thomassin-Naggara I; Cunha TM; Kinkel K; Masselli G; Kubik-Huch R; Spencer JA; Rockall A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2248-2257. PubMed ID: 27770228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Solid non-invasive ovarian masses on MR: histopathology and a diagnostic approach.
Tanaka YO; Okada S; Satoh T; Matsumoto K; Saida T; Oki A; Yoshikawa H; Minami M
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e91-7. PubMed ID: 20576386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging in discriminating between benign and malignant paediatric ovarian masses: a systematic review.
van Nimwegen LWE; Mavinkurve-Groothuis AMC; de Krijger RR; Hulsker CCC; Goverde AJ; Zsiros J; Littooij AS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1166-1181. PubMed ID: 31529256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indeterminate orbital masses: restricted diffusion at MR imaging with echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging predicts malignancy.
Sepahdari AR; Aakalu VK; Setabutr P; Shiehmorteza M; Naheedy JH; Mafee MF
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):554-64. PubMed ID: 20656840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of complex adnexal masses.
Cappabianca S; Iaselli F; Reginelli A; D'Andrea A; Urraro F; Grassi R; Rotondo A
Tumori; 2013; 99(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 23748816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate.
Weinreb JC; Barkoff ND; Megibow A; Demopoulos R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 2105017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging.
Parikh T; Drew SJ; Lee VS; Wong S; Hecht EM; Babb JS; Taouli B
Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):812-22. PubMed ID: 18223123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
