141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23065750)
21. Whole-genome sequencing reveals the mechanisms for evolution of streptomycin resistance in Lactobacillus plantarum.
Zhang F; Gao J; Wang B; Huo D; Wang Z; Zhang J; Shao Y
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):2867-2874. PubMed ID: 29397163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains from Algerian Infant Feces: Towards the Design of Probiotic Starter Cultures Tailored for Developing Countries.
Gheziel C; Russo P; Arena MP; Spano G; Ouzari HI; Kheroua O; Saidi D; Fiocco D; Kaddouri H; Capozzi V
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2019 Mar; 11(1):113-123. PubMed ID: 29460213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum C4 (CECT 9567), a potential probiotic strain isolated from kefir.
De Montijo-Prieto S; Castro DJ; Reina JC; Jimenez-Valera M; Ruiz-Bravo A
Arch Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 201(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 30759265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Global transcriptomic and proteomics analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum Y44 response to 2,2-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH) stress.
Gao Y; Liu Y; Ma F; Sun M; Mu G; Tuo Y
J Proteomics; 2020 Aug; 226():103903. PubMed ID: 32682107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tannic acid-dependent modulation of selected Lactobacillus plantarum traits linked to gastrointestinal survival.
Reverón I; Rodríguez H; Campos G; Curiel JA; Ascaso C; Carrascosa AV; Prieto A; de Las Rivas B; Muñoz R; de Felipe FL
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66473. PubMed ID: 23776675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Physiological function analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum Y44 based on genotypic and phenotypic characteristics.
Gao Y; Liu Y; Sun M; Zhang H; Mu G; Tuo Y
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):5916-5930. PubMed ID: 32418691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genotypic diversity of stress response in Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus paraplantarum and Lactobacillus pentosus.
Ricciardi A; Parente E; Guidone A; Ianniello RG; Zotta T; Abu Sayem SM; Varcamonti M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 157(2):278-85. PubMed ID: 22704047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Feed supplementation of Lactobacillus plantarum PCA 236 modulates gut microbiota and milk fatty acid composition in dairy goats--a preliminary study.
Maragkoudakis PA; Mountzouris KC; Rosu C; Zoumpopoulou G; Papadimitriou K; Dalaka E; Hadjipetrou A; Theofanous G; Strozzi GP; Carlini N; Zervas G; Tsakalidou E
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 141 Suppl 1():S109-16. PubMed ID: 20356645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Probiotic features of Lactobacillus plantarum mutant strains.
Bove P; Gallone A; Russo P; Capozzi V; Albenzio M; Spano G; Fiocco D
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Oct; 96(2):431-41. PubMed ID: 22573266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Viability and Stress Response of Putative Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Strains in Honey Environment.
Landry BKU; François ZN; Wang RY; Taicheng Z; Li Y
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2018 Dec; 10(4):629-637. PubMed ID: 29196921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application of the dynamic gastrointestinal simulator (simgi®) to assess the impact of probiotic supplementation in the metabolism of grape polyphenols.
Gil-Sánchez I; Cueva C; Tamargo A; Quintela JC; de la Fuente E; Walker AW; Moreno-Arribas MV; Bartolomé B
Food Res Int; 2020 Mar; 129():108790. PubMed ID: 32036893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Functional probiotic attributes and gene encoding plantaracin among variant Lactobacillus Plantarum strains.
Manzoor A; Tayyeb A
Microb Pathog; 2019 Jun; 131():22-32. PubMed ID: 30902731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genotypic adaptations associated with prolonged persistence of Lactobacillus plantarum in the murine digestive tract.
van Bokhorst-van de Veen H; Smelt MJ; Wels M; van Hijum SA; de Vos P; Kleerebezem M; Bron PA
Biotechnol J; 2013 Aug; 8(8):895-904. PubMed ID: 24066356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spatial and temporal expression of Lactobacillus plantarum genes in the gastrointestinal tracts of mice.
Marco ML; Bongers RS; de Vos WM; Kleerebezem M
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 73(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 17071785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35.
Benbara T; Lalouche S; Drider D; Bendali F
Benef Microbes; 2020 Mar; 11(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 32131607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Isolation of adhesive strains and evaluation of the colonization and immune response by Lactobacillus plantarum L2 in the rat gastrointestinal tract.
Wang B; Li J; Li Q; Zhang H; Li N
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Jun; 132(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 19386375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative Genomic Analysis of
Yu J; Ahn S; Kim K; Caetano-Anolles K; Lee C; Kang J; Cho K; Yoon SH; Kang DK; Kim H
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):1419-1427. PubMed ID: 28621109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 7315 and CECT 7316 isolated from faeces of healthy children.
Bosch M; Rodriguez M; Garcia F; Fernández E; Fuentes MC; Cuñé J
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 54(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 22188552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Molecular Switch Controlling Expression of the Mannose-Specific Adhesin, Msa, in
Holst B; Glenting J; Holmstrøm K; Israelsen H; Vrang A; Antonsson M; Ahrné S; Madsen SM
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 May; 85(10):. PubMed ID: 30877113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Kinetics and intensity of the expression of genes involved in the stress response tightly induced by phenolic acids in Lactobacillus plantarum.
Licandro-Seraut H; Gury J; Tran NP; Barthelmebs L; Cavin JF
J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008; 14(1-3):41-7. PubMed ID: 17957109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
