These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23066063)
1. Information science. Standards and infrastructure for innovation data exchange. Haak LL; Baker D; Ginther DK; Gordon GJ; Probus MA; Kannankutty N; Weinberg BA Science; 2012 Oct; 338(6104):196-7. PubMed ID: 23066063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The end of scientific articles as we know them? West R J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():276. PubMed ID: 26163126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Open Access to data for a new, open science. Giglia E; Swan A Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Dec; 48(4):713-6. PubMed ID: 23183458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Open access publishing: a disruptive innovation. Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2014; 62(2):69-71. PubMed ID: 24630674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The plan to mine the world's research papers. Pulla P Nature; 2019 Jul; 571(7765):316-318. PubMed ID: 31316198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reaching standards for dissemination: a case study. Christensen H; Griffiths K Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):459-63. PubMed ID: 17911759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Science publishers try new tack to combat unauthorized paper sharing. Schiermeier Q Nature; 2017 May; 545(7653):145-146. PubMed ID: 28492265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pandemic researchers - recruit your own best critics. Lakens D Nature; 2020 May; 581(7807):121. PubMed ID: 32393923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Data standards for Omics data: the basis of data sharing and reuse. Chervitz SA; Deutsch EW; Field D; Parkinson H; Quackenbush J; Rocca-Serra P; Sansone SA; Stoeckert CJ; Taylor CF; Taylor R; Ball CA Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 719():31-69. PubMed ID: 21370078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fair exchange. Pittman C J Okla State Med Assoc; 2011; 104(11-12):2 pages following 431. PubMed ID: 22413419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Twelve principles for open innovation 2.0. Curley M Nature; 2016 May; 533(7603):314-6. PubMed ID: 27193662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The concise argument. Holm S J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):65. PubMed ID: 21257620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On data availability, reproducibility and reuse. Nat Cell Biol; 2017 Mar; 19(4):259. PubMed ID: 28361940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of medical journal press releases on the quality of associated newspaper coverage: retrospective cohort study. Schwartz LM; Woloshin S; Andrews A; Stukel TA BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d8164. PubMed ID: 22286507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research. Kwon D Nature; 2020 May; 581(7807):130-131. PubMed ID: 32382120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Standards of Reporting Kampo Products (STORK) in research articles. Motoo Y; Hakamatsuka T; Kawahara N; Arai I; Tsutani K J Integr Med; 2017 May; 15(3):182-185. PubMed ID: 28494848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Clinical Practice Perspective on Publishing in Oncology Nursing. Gobel BH Semin Oncol Nurs; 2018 Nov; 34(4):386-392. PubMed ID: 30279023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intellectual property issues and synthetic biology standards. Contreras JL; Rai AK; Torrance AW Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Jan; 33(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 25574630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]