BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23066242)

  • 1. Piezosurgical osteotomy for harvesting intraoral block bone graft.
    Lakshmiganthan M; Gokulanathan S; Shanmugasundaram N; Daniel R; Ramesh SB
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2012 Aug; 4(Suppl 2):S165-8. PubMed ID: 23066242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Piezoelectric osteotomy for intraoral harvesting of bone blocks.
    Sohn DS; Ahn MR; Lee WH; Yeo DS; Lim SY
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Apr; 27(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 17514884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Piezoelectric surgery: twenty years of use.
    Labanca M; Azzola F; Vinci R; Rodella LF
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 46(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 18342999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Ultrasonic bone cutting in oral surgery: a review of 60 cases].
    Stübinger S; Landes C; Seitz O; Zeilhofer HF; Sader R
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Feb; 29(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18270888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MicroSaw and Piezosurgery in Harvesting Mandibular Bone Blocks from the Retromolar Region: A Randomized Split-Mouth Prospective Clinical Trial.
    Hanser T; Doliveux R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):365-372. PubMed ID: 29534125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of conventional surgery and piezoelectric surgery bone harvesting techniques on the donor site morbidity of the mandibular ramus and symphysis.
    Altiparmak N; Soydan SS; Uckan S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1131-7. PubMed ID: 25979191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Development and clinical application of ultrasonic osteotomy in dentistry].
    Su YC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 16(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17377690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Piezosurgery applied to implant dentistry: clinical and biological aspects.
    Pereira CC; Gealh WC; Meorin-Nogueira L; Garcia-Júnior IR; Okamoto R
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jul; 40 Spec No():401-8. PubMed ID: 25020222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maxillary Segmental Micro Osteotomy: A Human Cadaver Study on the Efficacy of the Technique.
    Robiony M; Gelpi F; Finotti M; Testori T
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):2418-20. PubMed ID: 26594971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alveolar splitting with Piezosurgery®, bone bank grafts and NobelActive implants as an alternative to major bone grafting for maxillary reconstruction.
    Albanese M; Ricciardi G; Luciano U; Donadello D; Lucchese A; Gelpi F; Zangani A; De Santis D; Rizzini A; Rossetto A; Bertossi D
    Minerva Stomatol; 2019 Feb; 68(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28677938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental Comparison of the Performance of Cutting Bone and Soft Tissue between Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments.
    Otake Y; Nakamura M; Henmi A; Takahashi T; Sasano Y
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17154. PubMed ID: 30464184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Piezoelectric Bone Surgery. Overview in Applications and Proof of Feasibility in Hand and Plastic Surgery.
    Leti Acciaro A; Lando M; Starnoni M; Giuca G; Adani R
    Indian J Orthop; 2022 Jan; 56(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 35070144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alveolar Ridge Split Technique Using Piezosurgery with Specially Designed Tips.
    Moro A; Gasparini G; Foresta E; Saponaro G; Falchi M; Cardarelli L; De Angelis P; Forcione M; Garagiola U; D'Amato G; Pelo S
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():4530378. PubMed ID: 28246596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in alveolar distraction osteogenesis in a series of 17 patients.
    González-García A; Diniz-Freitas M; Somoza-Martín M; García-García A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):891-6. PubMed ID: 19014159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Piezoelectric Device Versus Conventional Osteotomy Instruments in the Comparison of Three Different Bone Harvesting Methods: An Istomorphometric, Phonometric, and Chronometric Evaluation.
    Valente NA; Cosma L; Nocca G; D'Addona A; Lajolo C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1070–1077. PubMed ID: 30742138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reconstraction of severe anterior maxillary ridge atrophy: combination of several surgical techniques].
    Schwartz-Arad D
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2017 Jan; 34(1):45-51, 74. PubMed ID: 30699495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cell viability after osteotomy and bone harvesting: comparison of piezoelectric surgery and conventional bur.
    Mouraret S; Houschyar KS; Hunter DJ; Smith AA; Jew OS; Girod S; Helms JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Aug; 43(8):966-71. PubMed ID: 24721169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical and horizontal bone augmentation with the intraoral autogenous J-graft.
    Moghadam HG
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):230-8. PubMed ID: 19509533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Piezosurgery in Hallux Valgus Correction: Distal Linear Osteotomy Operative Technique Using Piezoelectric Tools.
    Russo A; Caravelli S; Mosca M; Girolami M; Ortolani A; Massimi S; Fuiano M; Zaffagnini S
    Joints; 2019 Mar; 7(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 31879727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temperature and time variations during osteotomies performed with different piezosurgical devices: an in vitro study.
    Delgado-Ruiz RA; Sacks D; Palermo A; Calvo-Guirado JL; Perez-Albacete C; Romanos GE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1137-43. PubMed ID: 26439590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.