BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23066860)

  • 1. A 10-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with an 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone.
    Mordenfeld A; Albrektsson T; Hallman M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 16(3):435-46. PubMed ID: 23066860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants.
    Hatano N; Shimizu Y; Ooya K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 15142097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 3-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone Clinical, radiographic and resonance frequency analysis.
    Hallman M; Sennerby L; Zetterqvist L; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 34(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 15741036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
    Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
    Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone.
    Hallman M; Hedin M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Mar; 60(3):277-84; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 11887139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone.
    Lindgren C; Mordenfeld A; Hallman M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 20491816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
    Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Outcome of Implants Placed in Staged Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed with Autogenous Bone at Three Different Ratios: A 5-Year Prospective Follow-up Study.
    Krennmair S; Weinländer M; Malek M; Forstner T; Krennmair G; Stimmelmayr M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(21):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 30427967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants: a retrospective study in 50 patients.
    Hallman M; Nordin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15101593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scintigraphic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses of bovine bone mineral and autogenous bone mixture in sinus floor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial--results after 4 months of healing.
    Pikdöken L; Gürbüzer B; Küçükodacı Z; Urhan M; Barış E; Tezulaş E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 21050644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb) alone compared to autogenous bone grafts.
    Zijderveld SA; Zerbo IR; van den Bergh JP; Schulten EA; ten Bruggenkate CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 15973955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 5-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with an 80:20 mixture of bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone.
    Hallman M; Zetterqvist L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 15669708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective study of implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal and moderate residual crestal bone: results after 1 to 5 years.
    Urban IA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1203-12. PubMed ID: 21197499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years.
    Zijderveld SA; Schulten EA; Aartman IH; ten Bruggenkate CM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):691-700. PubMed ID: 19453567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Healing in smokers versus nonsmokers: survival rates for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement.
    Peleg M; Garg AK; Mazor Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 16955605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of implant surface and grafting protocol on clinical outcomes of endosseous implants.
    Marchetti C; Pieri F; Trasarti S; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 17622006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stability of Grafted Implant Placement Sites After Sinus Floor Elevation Using a Layering Technique: 10-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results.
    Khoury F; Keller P; Keeve PL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(5):1086-1096. PubMed ID: 28906506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal bone loss in implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Fernández-Jiménez A; O'Valle F; Silvestre FJ; Sánchez-Fernández E; Monje A; Catena A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 23714301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of cancellous block allograft for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the posterior atrophic maxilla.
    Chaushu G; Mardinger O; Calderon S; Moses O; Nissan J
    J Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 19254126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.