These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23066877)

  • 1. Feedback-related potentials are sensitive to sequential order of decision outcomes in a gambling task.
    Osinsky R; Mussel P; Hewig J
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Dec; 49(12):1579-89. PubMed ID: 23066877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Feb; 49(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 22091824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. P300, not feedback error-related negativity, manifests the waiting cost of receiving reward information.
    Wang J; Chen J; Lei Y; Li P
    Neuroreport; 2014 Sep; 25(13):1044-8. PubMed ID: 25004079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The near-miss effect in slot-machine gambling: modulation of feedback-related negativity by subjective value.
    Luo Q; Wang Y; Qu C
    Neuroreport; 2011 Dec; 22(18):989-93. PubMed ID: 22045258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsibility modulates neural mechanisms of outcome processing: an ERP study.
    Li P; Han C; Lei Y; Holroyd CB; Li H
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1129-33. PubMed ID: 21729102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Representing the consequences of our actions trial by trial: Complex and flexible encoding of feedback valence and magnitude.
    Padrón I; Fernández-Rey J; Acuña C; Pardo-Vazquez JL
    Neuroscience; 2016 Oct; 333():264-76. PubMed ID: 27457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contextual valence modulates the neural dynamics of risk processing.
    Zheng Y; Li Q; Wang K; Wu H; Liu X
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Jul; 52(7):895-904. PubMed ID: 25664392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anxiety and feedback negativity.
    Gu R; Huang YX; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Sep; 47(5):961-7. PubMed ID: 20374540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.
    Watts ATM; Bachman MD; Bernat EM
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():242-252. PubMed ID: 28865935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The feedback negativity reflects favorable compared to nonfavorable outcomes based on global, not local, alternatives.
    Kujawa A; Smith E; Luhmann C; Hajcak G
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Feb; 50(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 23241216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice.
    Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 May; 15(5):535-44. PubMed ID: 15319308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does cognitive reappraisal affect the response to gains and losses?
    Yang Q; Gu R; Tang P; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1094-103. PubMed ID: 23889144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of invalid feedback on learning and feedback-related brain activity in decision-making.
    Ernst B; Steinhauser M
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Oct; 99():78-86. PubMed ID: 26263382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by interpersonal relationship: an ERP study.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 19822163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real and fictive outcomes are processed differently but converge on a common adaptive mechanism.
    Fischer AG; Ullsperger M
    Neuron; 2013 Sep; 79(6):1243-55. PubMed ID: 24050408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relationship between learning strategy and feedback processing in the weather prediction task--Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Rustemeier M; Schwabe L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 23347964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociating absolute and relative reward- and punishment-related electrocortical processing: An event-related potential study.
    Wischnewski M; Schutter DJLG
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():13-19. PubMed ID: 29481828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transient and sustained ERP activity related to feedback processing in the probabilistic selection task.
    West R; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():1-12. PubMed ID: 29499240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blunted feedback processing during risky decision making in adolescents with a parental history of substance use disorders.
    Euser AS; Greaves-Lord K; Crowley MJ; Evans BE; Huizink AC; Franken IH
    Dev Psychopathol; 2013 Nov; 25(4 Pt 1):1119-36. PubMed ID: 24229553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.