BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

562 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23066982)

  • 1. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
    Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do pigeons prefer alternatives that include near-hit outcomes?
    Stagner JP; Case JP; Sticklen MF; Duncan AK; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 26167775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rats are optimal in a choice task in which pigeons are not.
    Trujano RE; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():22-7. PubMed ID: 26200394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rats' preferences in the suboptimal choice procedure: Evaluating the impact of reinforcement probability and conditioned inhibitors.
    Alba R; Rodríguez W; Martínez M; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():574-582. PubMed ID: 29689334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal behavior by rats in a choice task is associated to a persistent conditioned inhibition effect.
    Trujano RE; López P; Rojas-Leguizamón M; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():65-70. PubMed ID: 27421608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.
    Smith AP; Bailey AR; Chow JJ; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159336. PubMed ID: 27441394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).
    Zentall TR; Stagner JP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of contingency discriminability in suboptimal choice.
    López-Tolsa GE; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104511. PubMed ID: 34562512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?
    Zentall TR; Case JP; Andrews DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1952-1957. PubMed ID: 29188447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditioned reinforcement by conditional discriminative stimuli.
    Ohta A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 3361266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suboptimal choice by pigeons is eliminated when key-pecking behavior is replaced by treadle-pressing.
    González-Torres R; Flores J; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104157. PubMed ID: 32497555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imitative learning of stimulus-response and response-outcome associations in pigeons.
    Saggerson AL; George DN; Honey RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 16045384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observing responses maintained by conditional discriminative stimuli.
    Ohta A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Nov; 48(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 3430109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Does the predictive value of the conditioned reinforcer alone determine choice?
    Case JP; Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():320-326. PubMed ID: 30077654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrete-trial vs. continuous free-operant procedures in assessing whether reinforcement context affects reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 18054442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral functions of stimuli signaling transitions across rich and lean schedules of reinforcement.
    Everly JB; Holtyn AF; Perone M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 24446283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.
    Friedrich AM; Clement TS; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 16396080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.