354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23067903)
1. Saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: safe and effective with reduced hospital length of stay.
Bundhoo SS; Earp E; Ivanauskiene T; Kunadian V; Freeman P; Edwards R; Kinnaird TD; Zaman A; Anderson RA
Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23067903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radial versus femoral approach for saphenous vein grafts angiography and interventions.
Israeli Z; Lavi S; Pancholy SB; Nombela-Franco L; Gilchrist IC; Gilchrist IC; Aldazabal A; Sharabi-Nov A; Levi Y; Hayman S; Tzemos N; Ayán D; Mamas MA; Bagur R
Am Heart J; 2019 Apr; 210():1-8. PubMed ID: 30711875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route.
Rathore S; Roberts E; Hakeem AR; Pauriah M; Beaumont A; Morris JL
J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 22(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 19689657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.
Baker NC; O'Connell EW; Htun WW; Sun H; Green SM; Skelding KA; Blankenship JC; Scott TD; Berger PB
Am Heart J; 2014 Oct; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 25262264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crossover from radial to femoral access during a challenging percutaneous coronary intervention can make the difference between success and failure.
Cooper L; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(4):266.e5-8. PubMed ID: 20934669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approach in vein graft PCI. A retrospective study.
Ziakas A; Klinke P; Mildenberger R; Fretz E; Williams M; Della Siega A; Kinloch D; Hilton D
Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2005; 7(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 16093218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence and outcomes of trans-radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practise.
Asrar Ul Haq M; Tsay IM; Dinh DT; Brennan A; Clark D; Cox N; Harper R; Nadurata V; Andrianopoulos N; Reid C; Duffy SJ; Lefkovits J; van Gaal WJ
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():264-8. PubMed ID: 27404687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Drug-eluting stenting of saphenous vein graft versus native coronary artery supplying the same myocardial perfusion territory: a pilot retrospective 3-year follow-up.
Ho PC; Lee AC; Fortuna R
J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 24(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 23043035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.
Rao SV; Hess CN; Barham B; Aberle LH; Anstrom KJ; Patel TB; Jorgensen JP; Mazzaferri EL; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Newby LK; Gibson CM; Kong DF; Mehran R; Waksman R; Gilchrist IC; McCourt BJ; Messenger JC; Peterson ED; Harrington RA; Krucoff MW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):857-67. PubMed ID: 25147030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.
Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S;
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).
Feldman DN; Swaminathan RV; Kaltenbach LA; Baklanov DV; Kim LK; Wong SC; Minutello RM; Messenger JC; Moussa I; Garratt KN; Piana RN; Hillegass WB; Cohen MG; Gilchrist IC; Rao SV
Circulation; 2013 Jun; 127(23):2295-306. PubMed ID: 23753843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients undergoing PCI from the femoral route by default radial operators are at high risk of vascular access-site complications.
Rafie IM; Uddin MM; Ossei-Gerning N; Anderson RA; Kinnaird TD
EuroIntervention; 2014 Feb; 9(10):1189-94. PubMed ID: 24561736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial.
Jolly SS; Cairns J; Niemela K; Steg PG; Natarajan MK; Cheema AN; Rao SV; Cantor WJ; Džavík V; Budaj A; Sheth T; Valentin V; Fung A; Widimsky P; Ferrari E; Gao P; Jedrzejowski B; Mehta SR;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23517837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein bypass graft percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the Veterans Affairs CART program.
Aggarwal V; Stanislawski MA; Maddox TM; Nallamothu BK; Grunwald G; Adams JC; Ho PM; Rao SV; Casserly IP; Rumsfeld JS; Brilakis ES; Tsai TT
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 64(17):1825-36. PubMed ID: 25443706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the transradial and the transfemoral approach in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.
Rathore S; Hakeem A; Pauriah M; Roberts E; Beaumont A; Morris JL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jun; 73(7):883-7. PubMed ID: 19455660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft lesions: from Western Denmark Heart Registry.
Hougaard M; Thayssen P; Kaltoft A; Tilsted HH; Maeng M; Lassen JF; Thuesen L; Okkels Jensen L
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jun; 83(7):1035-42. PubMed ID: 24311384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of fluoroscopy time during coronary angiography and interventions by radial and femoral routes- can we decrease the fluoroscopy time with increased experience? An observational study.
Farman MT; Khan NU; Sial JA; Saghir T; Rizvi SN; Zaman KS
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2011 Nov; 11(7):607-12. PubMed ID: 21959874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
