184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23070098)
41. Automatic lesion detection, segmentation and characterization via 3D multiscale morphological sifting in breast MRI.
Min H; McClymont D; Chandra SS; Crozier S; Bradley AP
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Nov; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 35045404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Breast cancer detection from MR images through an auto-probing discrete Fourier transform system.
Sim KS; Chia FK; Nia ME; Tso CP; Chong AK; Abbas SF; Chong SS
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jun; 49():46-59. PubMed ID: 24736203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A preliminary study on computerized lesion localization in MR mammography using 3D nMITR maps, multilayer cellular neural networks, and fuzzy c-partitioning.
Ertas G; Gulcur HO; Tunaci M; Osman O; Ucan ON
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 18293575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Computerized detection of breast lesions in multi-centre and multi-instrument DCE-MR data using 3D principal component maps and template matching.
Ertas G; Doran S; Leach MO
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 56(24):7795-811. PubMed ID: 22107781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Boosting in Nonlinear Regression Models with an Application to DCE-MRI Data.
Feilke M; Bischl B; Schmid VJ; Gertheiss J
Methods Inf Med; 2016; 55(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 26577400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A new background distribution-based active contour model for three-dimensional lesion segmentation in breast DCE-MRI.
Liu H; Liu Y; Zhao Z; Zhang L; Qiu T
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):082303. PubMed ID: 25086552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrast-enhanced MR-mammography.
Vomweg TW; Buscema M; Kauczor HU; Teifke A; Intraligi M; Terzi S; Heussel CP; Achenbach T; Rieker O; Mayer D; Thelen M
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2350-9. PubMed ID: 14528957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A computer-aided diagnosis system for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images based on level set segmentation and ReliefF feature selection.
Pang Z; Zhu D; Chen D; Li L; Shao Y
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():450531. PubMed ID: 25628755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Computer-aided detection of retained surgical needles from postoperative radiographs.
Sengupta A; Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Cha K; Chronis N; Marentis TC
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):180-191. PubMed ID: 28044343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Classification of breast lesions pre-contrast injection using water resonance lineshape analysis.
Wood AM; Medved M; Bacchus ID; Al-Hallaq HA; Shimauchi A; Newstead GM; Olopade OI; Venkataraman SS; Ivancevic MK; Karczmar GS
NMR Biomed; 2013 May; 26(5):569-77. PubMed ID: 23165988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluating an optical-flow-based registration algorithm for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Martel AL; Froh MS; Brock KK; Plewes DB; Barber DC
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3803-16. PubMed ID: 17664578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Computer Aided Detection (CAD) for breast MRI.
Wood C
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Feb; 4(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15649087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An ellipsoid convex enhancement filter for detection of asymptomatic intracranial aneurysm candidates in CAD frameworks.
Jin Z; Arimura H; Kakeda S; Yamashita F; Sasaki M; Korogi Y
Med Phys; 2016 Feb; 43(2):951-60. PubMed ID: 26843255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Computer-assisted diagnosis of prostate cancer using DCE-MRI data: design, implementation and preliminary results.
Puech P; Betrouni N; Makni N; Dewalle AS; Villers A; Lemaitre L
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20033597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Spatio-temporal bandwidth-based acquisition for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Krishnan S; Chenevert TL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 20(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 15221818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced examinations with fat suppression: are contrast-agent uptake curves affected by magnetic field inhomogeneity?
Schmidt MA; Borri M; Scurr E; Ertas G; Payne G; O'Flynn E; Desouza N; Leach MO
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1537-45. PubMed ID: 23242002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Computer-aided detection in breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dorrius MD; Jansen-van der Weide MC; van Ooijen PM; Pijnappel RM; Oudkerk M
Eur Radiol; 2011 Aug; 21(8):1600-8. PubMed ID: 21404134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Rapid image stitching and computer-aided detection for multipass automated breast ultrasound.
Chang RF; Chang-Chien KC; Takada E; Huang CS; Chou YH; Kuo CM; Chen JH
Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2063-73. PubMed ID: 20527539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Computer-aided detection of brain metastases using a three-dimensional template-based matching algorithm.
Perez-Ramirez U; Arana E; Moratal D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2384-7. PubMed ID: 25570469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessing algorithms for defining vascular architecture in subharmonic images of breast lesions.
Eisenbrey JR; Joshi N; Dave JK; Forsberg F
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):919-30. PubMed ID: 21248388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
