182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23070098)
61. Computer-aided detection of metastatic brain tumors using magnetic resonance black-blood imaging.
Yang S; Nam Y; Kim MO; Kim EY; Park J; Kim DH
Invest Radiol; 2013 Feb; 48(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 23211553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. LECANDUS study (LEsion CANdidate Detection in UltraSound Data): evaluation of image analysis algorithms for breast lesion detection in volume ultrasound data.
Golatta M; Zeegers D; Filippatos K; Binder LL; Scharf A; Rauch G; Rom J; Schütz F; Sohn C; Heil J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 294(2):423-8. PubMed ID: 27236704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Development of a Computer-aided Diagnosis System to Distinguish between Benign and Malignant Mammary Tumors in Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Images: Automatic Detection of the Position with the Strongest Washout Effect in the Tumor].
Miyazaki Y; Tabata N; Taroura T; Shinozaki K; Kubo Y; Tokunaga E; Taguchi K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(3):251-261. PubMed ID: 29563394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.
Rakoczy M; McGaughey D; Korenberg MJ; Levman J; Martel AL
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Apr; 26(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 22828783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Image fusion for dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Twellmann T; Saalbach A; Gerstung O; Leach MO; Nattkemper TW
Biomed Eng Online; 2004 Oct; 3(1):35. PubMed ID: 15494072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. [Computer-aided Diagnosis in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Malignant Tumor:A Technical Review of Current Research].
Zhou Y; Qin J; Bin G; Chen H; Feng S; Wang T; Huang B
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 33(4):794-800. PubMed ID: 29714922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Multiple Sclerosis lesions detection by a hybrid Watershed-Clustering algorithm.
Bonanno L; Mammone N; De Salvo S; Bramanti A; Rifici C; Sessa E; Bramanti P; Marino S; Ciurleo R
Clin Imaging; 2021 Apr; 72():162-167. PubMed ID: 33278790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Independent component analysis for the examination of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging data: preliminary study.
Yoo SS; Gil Choi B; Han JY; Hee Kim H
Invest Radiol; 2002 Dec; 37(12):647-54. PubMed ID: 12446997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A comprehensive hierarchical classification based on multi-features of breast DCE-MRI for cancer diagnosis.
Liu H; Wang J; Gao J; Liu S; Liu X; Zhao Z; Guo D; Dan G
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Oct; 58(10):2413-2425. PubMed ID: 32749555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Automatic breast lesion detection in ultrafast DCE-MRI using deep learning.
Ayatollahi F; Shokouhi SB; Mann RM; Teuwen J
Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):5897-5907. PubMed ID: 34370886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. An automated skin segmentation of Breasts in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Lee CY; Chang TF; Chang NY; Chang YC
Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):6159. PubMed ID: 29670156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Automated Detection and Segmentation of Nonmass-Enhancing Breast Tumors with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Illan IA; Ramirez J; Gorriz JM; Marino MA; Avendano D; Helbich T; Baltzer P; Pinker K; Meyer-Baese A
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():5308517. PubMed ID: 30647551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Computer-assisted detection of subcutaneous melanomas: feasibility assessment.
Solomon J; Mavinkurve S; Cox D; Summers RM
Acad Radiol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):678-85. PubMed ID: 15172370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Automated Detection Algorithm of Breast Masses in Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Images.
Jeong JW; Yu D; Lee S; Chang JM
Healthc Inform Res; 2016 Oct; 22(4):293-298. PubMed ID: 27895961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Breast magnetic resonance imaging: management of an enhancing focus.
Ha R; Comstock CE
Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 24792658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Automatic deep learning method for detection and classification of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Gao W; Chen J; Zhang B; Wei X; Zhong J; Li X; He X; Zhao F; Chen X
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2620-2633. PubMed ID: 37064362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Performance Analysis of Various Nanocontrast Agents and CAD Systems for Cancer Diagnosis.
Thanapandiyaraj R; Rajendran T; Mohammedgani PB
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(9):831-852. PubMed ID: 32008531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Residual analysis of the water resonance signal in breast lesions imaged with high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI: a pilot study.
Weiss WA; Medved M; Karczmar GS; Giger ML
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):012303. PubMed ID: 24387524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Spatially regularized estimation for the analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data.
Sommer JC; Gertheiss J; Schmid VJ
Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):1029-41. PubMed ID: 24123120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Cortical bone vessel identification and quantification on contrast-enhanced MR images.
Wu PH; Gibbons M; Foreman SC; Carballido-Gamio J; Han M; Krug R; Liu J; Link TM; Kazakia GJ
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2019 Jun; 9(6):928-941. PubMed ID: 31367547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
