These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23070234)

  • 1. Perception of 3-D location based on vision, touch, and extended touch.
    Giudice NA; Klatzky RL; Bennett CR; Loomis JM
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 224(1):141-53. PubMed ID: 23070234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals.
    Giudice NA; Betty MR; Loomis JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 21299331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pointing to azimuths and elevations of targets: blind and blindfolded-sighted.
    Wnuczko M; Kennedy JM
    Perception; 2014; 43(2-3):117-28. PubMed ID: 24919348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vision of the body and the differentiation of perceived body side in touch.
    Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Cortex; 2013 May; 49(5):1340-51. PubMed ID: 22531552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations.
    Darling WG; Miller GF
    Exp Brain Res; 1993; 93(3):534-47. PubMed ID: 8519342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
    Eimer M; Driver J
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Sep; 37(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 11037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity.
    Gepshtein S; Burge J; Ernst MO; Banks MS
    J Vis; 2005 Dec; 5(11):1013-23. PubMed ID: 16441199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of age, spatial memory, and ocular fixation on localization of auditory, visual, and bimodal targets by human subjects.
    Dobreva MS; O'Neill WE; Paige GD
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Dec; 223(4):441-55. PubMed ID: 23076429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision.
    Gray R; Tan HZ
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jul; 145(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 12070744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Touch responses made to remembered and visual target locations in the dark: a human psychophysical study.
    Burke MR; Grieve KL
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 15502990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encoding, learning, and spatial updating of multiple object locations specified by 3-D sound, spatial language, and vision.
    Klatzky RL; Lippa Y; Loomis JM; Golledge RG
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 149(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 12592503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.
    Takahashi C; Watt SJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1361-1373. PubMed ID: 28214998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation.
    van Beers RJ; Wolpert DM; Haggard P
    Curr Biol; 2002 May; 12(10):834-7. PubMed ID: 12015120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial working memory for locations specified by vision and audition: testing the amodality hypothesis.
    Loomis JM; Klatzky RL; McHugh B; Giudice NA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1260-7. PubMed ID: 22552825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generic properties of curvature sensing through vision and touch.
    Dresp-Langley B
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():634168. PubMed ID: 24454538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discriminating speech rhythms in audition, vision, and touch.
    Navarra J; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():197-205. PubMed ID: 25046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Much Spatial Information Is Lost in the Sensory Substitution Process? Comparing Visual, Tactile, and Auditory Approaches.
    Richardson M; Thar J; Alvarez J; Borchers J; Ward J; Hamilton-Fletcher G
    Perception; 2019 Nov; 48(11):1079-1103. PubMed ID: 31547778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Updating visual memory across eye movements for ocular and arm motor control.
    Thompson AA; Henriques DY
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 100(5):2507-14. PubMed ID: 18768640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seeing and feeling for self and other: proprioceptive spatial location determines multisensory enhancement of touch.
    Cardini F; Haggard P; Ladavas E
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23376293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-Modal Correspondence Among Vision, Audition, and Touch in Natural Objects: An Investigation of the Perceptual Properties of Wood.
    Kanaya S; Kariya K; Fujisaki W
    Perception; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1099-114. PubMed ID: 27257036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.