BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23070483)

  • 1. The new VARSKIN 4 photon skin dosimetry model.
    Hamby DM; Lodwick CJ; Palmer TS; Reese SR; Higley KA; Caffrey JA; Sherbini S; Saba M; Bush-Goddard SP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 23070483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PERFORMANCE OF THE VARSKIN 5 (v5.3) ELECTRON DOSIMETRY MODEL.
    Anspach LJ; Hamby DM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 29378064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the photon dose calculation model in the VARSKIN 4 skin dose computer code.
    Sherbini S; Decicco J; Struckmeyer R; Saba M; Bush-Goddard S
    Health Phys; 2012 Dec; 103(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 23111523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Verification of the VARSKIN beta skin dose calculation computer code.
    Sherbini S; DeCicco J; Gray AT; Struckmeyer R
    Health Phys; 2008 Jun; 94(6):527-38. PubMed ID: 18469586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of cellular irradiation techniques with alpha particles using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit.
    Incerti S; Gault N; Habchi C; Lefaix JL; Moretto P; Poncy JL; Pouthier T; Seznec H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17132663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimising cylinder model dimensions for VARSKIN to simulate a droplet of radionuclide skin contamination using Geant4 Monte Carlo code.
    James G; O'Brien J; Thomson B
    Nucl Med Commun; 2023 May; 44(5):366-374. PubMed ID: 36897054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation on the use of data-driven scattering profiles in Monte Carlo simulations of ultraviolet light propagation in skin tissues.
    Baranoski GV; Krishnaswamy A; Kimmel B
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(20):4799-809. PubMed ID: 15566176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A COMPARISON OF BETA SKIN DOSES CALCULATED WITH VARSKIN 5.35.3 AND MCNP5.
    Dubeau J; Hakmana Witharana SS; Sun J; Heinmiller BE; Chase WJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):502-507. PubMed ID: 30053277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainties beyond statistics in Monte Carlo simulations.
    Hughes HG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):45-51. PubMed ID: 17766264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skin dose from radionuclide contamination on clothing.
    Taylor DC; Hussein EM; Yuen PS
    Health Phys; 1997 Jun; 72(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 9169925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doppler broadening effect on low-energy photon dose calculations using MCNP5 and PENELOPE.
    Ye SJ; Ove R; Naqvi SA
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 16966879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of deterministic and Monte Carlo methods in shielding design.
    Oliveira AD; Oliveira C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):254-7. PubMed ID: 16381723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A practical Monte Carlo MU verification tool for IMRT quality assurance.
    Fan J; Li J; Chen L; Stathakis S; Luo W; Du Plessis F; Xiong W; Yang J; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2503-15. PubMed ID: 16675866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Setup and dosimetry for exposure of human skin in vivo to RF-EMF at 900 MHz.
    Toivonen T; Toivo T; Puranen L; Jokela K
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Apr; 29(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 18044739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculation of stopping power ratios for carbon ion dosimetry.
    Geithner O; Andreo P; Sobolevsky N; Hartmann G; Jäkel O
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2279-92. PubMed ID: 16625042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Averaged particle dose conversion coefficients in air crew dosimetry.
    Mares V; Roesler S; Schraube H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):371-6. PubMed ID: 15353676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of skyshine computational methods.
    Hertel NE; Sweezy JE; Shultis JK; Warkentin JK; Rose ZJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):525-33. PubMed ID: 16604692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.
    Jarry G; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate determination of dose-point-kernel functions close to the origin using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Janicki C; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):814-8. PubMed ID: 15124998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.