BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2307057)

  • 1. System for flow sorting chromosomes on the basis of pulse shape.
    Bartholdi MF; Parson JD; Albright KA; Cram LS
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 2307057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Instrument for real-time pulse-shape analysis of slit-scan flow cytometry signals.
    van Oven C; Aten JA
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 2379455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of pulse-shape criteria for the selection of dicentric chromosomes by slit-scan flow cytometry and sorting.
    Rens W; Van Oven CH; Stap J; Aten JA
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 May; 5(3):147-59. PubMed ID: 8343433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pulse generator simulating slit-scan chromosome analysis signals.
    Weier HU; Eisert WG
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 3948604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parallel processing data acquisition system for multilaser flow cytometry and cell sorting.
    van den Engh G; Stokdijk W
    Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 2714112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Centromeric index measurement by slit-scan flow cytometry.
    Lucas JN; Gray JW; Peters DC; Van Dilla MA
    Cytometry; 1983 Sep; 4(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 6628135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flow cytometric analysis using digital signal processing.
    Zilmer NA; Godavarti M; Rodriguez JJ; Yopp TA; Lambert GM; Galbraith DW
    Cytometry; 1995 Jun; 20(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 7664621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Centromeric index versus DNA content flow karyotypes of human chromosomes measured by means of slit-scan flow cytometry.
    Lucas JN; Gray JW
    Cytometry; 1987 May; 8(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 3595351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fringe-scan flow cytometry.
    Mullikin J; Norgren R; Lucas J; Gray J
    Cytometry; 1988 Mar; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 3359890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated particle classification based on digital acquisition and analysis of flow cytometric pulse waveforms.
    Godavarti M; Rodriguez JJ; Yopp TA; Lambert GM; Galbraith DW
    Cytometry; 1996 Aug; 24(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 8866217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-parameter data acquisition system for rapid slit-scan analysis of mammalian chromosomes.
    Weier HU; Eisert WG
    Cytometry; 1987 Jan; 8(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 3803098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On-line sorting of human chromosomes by centromeric index, and identification of sorted populations by GTG-banding and fluorescent in situ hybridization.
    Boschman GA; Rens W; Manders E; van Oven C; Barendsen GW; Aten JA
    Hum Genet; 1990 Jun; 85(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 2358302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromosome banding analysis by slit-scan flow cytometry.
    Bartholdi MF; Meyne J; Johnston RG; Cram LS
    Cytometry; 1989 Mar; 10(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 2496955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data acquisition and control system for multiparameter cell sorting based on DEC LSI-11 microprocessor.
    Voet L; Kurmann FJ; Hannig K
    Cytometry; 1982 May; 2(6):383-9. PubMed ID: 7075399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase-resolved fluorescence lifetime measurements for flow cytometry.
    Pinsky BG; Ladasky JJ; Lakowicz JR; Berndt K; Hoffman RA
    Cytometry; 1993; 14(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 8440147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance analysis of a dual-buffer architecture for digital flow cytometry.
    Murthi S; Sankaranarayanan S; Xia B; Lambert GM; Rodríguez JJ; Galbraith DW
    Cytometry A; 2005 Aug; 66(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 15973697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flow karyotyping and chromosome sorting in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.).
    Kubaláková M; Vrána J; Cíhalíková J; Simková H; Dolezel J
    Theor Appl Genet; 2002 Jun; 104(8):1362-1372. PubMed ID: 12582592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence of chromosome numerical changes in multiple myeloma: fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using 15 chromosome-specific probes.
    Tabernero D; San Miguel JF; Garcia-Sanz M; Nájera L; García-Isidoro M; Peréz-Simon JA; Gonzalez M; Wiegant J; Raap AK; Orfão A
    Am J Pathol; 1996 Jul; 149(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 8686739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. System for acquisition and real-time processing of multidimensional slit-scan flow cytometric data.
    Robinson RD; Wheeless DM; Hespelt SJ; Wheeless LL
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 2340774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flow cytometric detection of chromosome abnormalities by measuring centromeric index, DNA content, and DNA base composition.
    Rens W; Boschman GA; Hoovers JM; Manders EM; Slater RM; Stap J; Aten JA
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 May; 6(4):359-75. PubMed ID: 8060891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.