These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23070596)

  • 21. Estimation of Controlled Direct Effects in Longitudinal Mediation Analyses with Latent Variables in Randomized Studies.
    Loh WW; Moerkerke B; Loeys T; Poppe L; Crombez G; Vansteelandt S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(5):763-785. PubMed ID: 31726876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing moderated mediation in linear models requires fewer confounding assumptions than assessing mediation.
    Loeys T; Talloen W; Goubert L; Moerkerke B; Vansteelandt S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):352-374. PubMed ID: 27711981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.
    Robins JM; Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 1992 Mar; 3(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 1576220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders.
    Cepeda MS; Boston R; Farrar JT; Strom BL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Aug; 158(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 12882951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fallibility in estimating direct effects.
    Cole SR; Hernán MA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):163-5. PubMed ID: 11914314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sensitivity analysis for mistakenly adjusting for mediators in estimating total effect in observational studies.
    Wang T; Li H; Su P; Yu Y; Sun X; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Xue F
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e015640. PubMed ID: 29162569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies.
    Vansteelandt S
    Epidemiology; 2009 Nov; 20(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 19806060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
    Schuler MS; Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Specifying the correlation structure in inverse-probability- weighting estimation for repeated measures.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Glymour MM; Weuve J; Robins J
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jul; 23(4):644-6. PubMed ID: 22659551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitivity plots for confounder bias in the single mediator model.
    Cox MG; Kisbu-Sakarya Y; Miočević M; MacKinnon DP
    Eval Rev; 2013 Oct; 37(5):405-31. PubMed ID: 24681690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.
    Benedetti A; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3781-801. PubMed ID: 15580601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Invited commentary: G-computation--lost in translation?
    Vansteelandt S; Keiding N
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):739-42. PubMed ID: 21415028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Confounding of indirect effects: a sensitivity analysis exploring the range of bias due to a cause common to both the mediator and the outcome.
    Hafeman DM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 21652602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pragmatic trials: ignoring a mediator and adjusting for confounding.
    Pericleous P
    BMC Res Notes; 2019 Mar; 12(1):156. PubMed ID: 30894221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adjusting for outcome risk factors in immigrant datasets: total or direct effects?
    Nilsen RM; Klungsøyr K; Stigum H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):37. PubMed ID: 36765287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Misclassification of the mediator matters when estimating indirect effects.
    Blakely T; McKenzie S; Carter K
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2013 May; 67(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 23386673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examining the Error of Mis-Specifying Nonlinear Confounding Effect With Application on Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity.
    Lee PH
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2017 Jun; 88(2):203-208. PubMed ID: 28362223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A potential outcomes approach to defining and estimating gestational age-specific exposure effects during pregnancy.
    Schnitzer ME; Guerra SF; Longo C; Blais L; Platt RW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Feb; 31(2):300-314. PubMed ID: 34986058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.