These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23070723)

  • 21. A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; McMinn DJ; Daniel J; Lundberg A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1140-3. PubMed ID: 17905947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are CT Scans a Satisfactory Substitute for the Follow-Up of RSA Migration Studies of Uncemented Cups? A Comparison of RSA Double Examinations and CT Datasets of 46 Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Otten V; Maguire GQ; Noz ME; Zeleznik MP; Nilsson KG; Olivecrona H
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3681458. PubMed ID: 28243598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Association between contact hip stress and RSA-measured wear rates in total hip arthroplasties of 31 patients.
    The B; Hosman A; Kootstra J; Kralj-Iglic V; Flivik G; Verdonschot N; Diercks R
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 17942102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Weight bearing radiographs are not necessary for measurement of polyethylene penetration in total hip prostheses: a radiostereometric study of 111 patients examined in weight-bearing and supine position.
    von Schewelov T; Onsten I; Markusson P; Carlsson A
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 16534708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy and Precision of Three-Dimensional Low Dose CT Compared to Standard RSA in Acetabular Cups: An Experimental Study.
    Brodén C; Olivecrona H; Maguire GQ; Noz ME; Zeleznik MP; Sköldenberg O
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5909741. PubMed ID: 27478832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty.
    Lewis PM; Al-Belooshi A; Olsen M; Schemitch EH; Waddell JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 19195824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in upper limb arthroplasty.
    Ten Brinke B; Beumer A; Koenraadt KLM; Eygendaal D; Kraan GA; Mathijssen NMC
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Jun; 88(3):320-325. PubMed ID: 28464752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reassessment of computerized wear measurement for total hip arthroplasty with correction for projectional image distortion: a brief follow-up report.
    Kraay MJ; Moore RD; Martell JM; Rimnac CM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(9):1858-67. PubMed ID: 20686060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Catastrophic failure of an uncemented acetabular component due to high wear and osteolysis: an analysis of 154 omnifit prostheses with mean 6-year follow-up.
    von Schewelov T; Sanzén L; Onsten I; Carlsson A
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Jun; 75(3):283-94. PubMed ID: 15260420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of radiographic and radiostereometric wear measurement of different hip prostheses: an experimental study.
    von Schewelov T; Sanzén L; Börlin N; Markusson P; Onsten I
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Dec; 75(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 15762258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wear measurements with use of radiostereometric analysis in total hip arthroplasty with obscured femoral head.
    Johanson PE; Shareghi B; Eriksson M; Kärrholm J
    J Orthop Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):2040-2049. PubMed ID: 32056282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Continuous distal migration and internal rotation of the C-stem prosthesis without any adverse clinical effects: an RSA study of 33 primary total hip arthroplasties followed for up to ten years.
    von Schewelov T; Carlsson A; Sanzén L; Besjakov J
    Bone Joint J; 2014 May; 96-B(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 24788493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The seven-year wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.
    Thomas GE; Simpson DJ; Mehmood S; Taylor A; McLardy-Smith P; Gill HS; Murray DW; Glyn-Jones S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):716-22. PubMed ID: 21508278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Crosslinked polyethylene compared to conventional polyethylene in total hip replacement: pre-clinical evaluation, in-vitro testing and prospective clinical follow-up study.
    Geerdink CH; Grimm B; Ramakrishnan R; Rondhuis J; Verburg AJ; Tonino AJ
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Oct; 77(5):719-25. PubMed ID: 17068701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Otto Aufranc Award. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: randomized evaluation of penetration rate in cemented and uncemented sockets using radiostereometric analysis.
    Digas G; Kärrholm J; Thanner J; Malchau H; Herberts P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):6-16. PubMed ID: 15577460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Calvert GT; Devane PA; Fielden J; Adams K; Horne JG
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):505-10. PubMed ID: 18547784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. No difference in clinical outcome, bone density and polyethylene wear 5-7 years after standard navigated vs. conventional cementfree total hip arthroplasty.
    Keshmiri A; Schröter C; Weber M; Craiovan B; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 May; 135(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 25801810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between model-based RSA and an AI-based CT-RSA: an accuracy study of 30 patients.
    Christensson A; Nemati HM; Flivik G
    Acta Orthop; 2024 Jan; 95():39-46. PubMed ID: 38284788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of model-based radiostereometric analysis to measure femoral head penetration and cup migration in four different cup designs.
    Shareghi B; Johanson PE; Kärrholm J
    J Orthop Res; 2017 Apr; 35(4):760-767. PubMed ID: 26825861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.