These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23070759)

  • 21. Ecophysiological perspectives on engineered nanomaterial toxicity in fish and crustaceans.
    Callaghan NI; MacCormack TJ
    Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Mar; 193():30-41. PubMed ID: 28017784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nanomaterial health effects part 3: conclusion--hazardous issues and the precautionary principle.
    Kanarek MS
    WMJ; 2007 Feb; 106(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 17393752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conceptual modeling for identification of worst case conditions in environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials using nZVI and C60 as case studies.
    Grieger KD; Hansen SF; Sørensen PB; Baun A
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):4109-24. PubMed ID: 21737121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Toward toxicity testing of nanomaterials in the 21st century: a paradigm for moving forward.
    Lai DY
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol; 2012; 4(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 21965171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ONE Nano: NIEHS's strategic initiative on the health and safety effects of engineered nanomaterials.
    Schug TT; Johnson AF; Balshaw DM; Garantziotis S; Walker NJ; Weis C; Nadadur SS; Birnbaum LS
    Environ Health Perspect; 2013 Apr; 121(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 23407114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: practical experiences and recommendations from the bench.
    Handy RD; Cornelis G; Fernandes T; Tsyusko O; Decho A; Sabo-Attwood T; Metcalfe C; Steevens JA; Klaine SJ; Koelmans AA; Horne N
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Jan; 31(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 22002667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Creative use of analytical techniques and high-throughput technology to facilitate safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Xia T
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2018 Sep; 410(24):6097-6111. PubMed ID: 30066194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nanomaterial cell interactions: are current in vitro tests reliable?
    Hirsch C; Roesslein M; Krug HF; Wick P
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2011 Jul; 6(5):837-47. PubMed ID: 21793675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensors as tools for quantitation, nanotoxicity and nanomonitoring assessment of engineered nanomaterials.
    Sadik OA; Zhou AL; Kikandi S; Du N; Wang Q; Varner K
    J Environ Monit; 2009 Oct; 11(10):1782-800. PubMed ID: 19809701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterization of nanomaterials for toxicity assessment.
    Sayes CM; Warheit DB
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol; 2009; 1(6):660-70. PubMed ID: 20049823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nanotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) to environmentally relevant beneficial soil bacteria - a critical review.
    Lewis RW; Bertsch PM; McNear DH
    Nanotoxicology; 2019 Apr; 13(3):392-428. PubMed ID: 30760121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Advanced tools for the safety assessment of nanomaterials.
    Fadeel B; Farcal L; Hardy B; Vázquez-Campos S; Hristozov D; Marcomini A; Lynch I; Valsami-Jones E; Alenius H; Savolainen K
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2018 Jul; 13(7):537-543. PubMed ID: 29980781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment.
    Gottschalk F; Nowack B
    J Environ Monit; 2011 May; 13(5):1145-55. PubMed ID: 21387066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The carcinogenic potential of nanomaterials, their release from products and options for regulating them.
    Becker H; Herzberg F; Schulte A; Kolossa-Gehring M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2011 Jun; 214(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 21168363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Modern toxicology of magnetic nanomaterials].
    Cywińska MA; Grudziński IP
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2012; 63(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 23173329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Proteomic characterization of engineered nanomaterial-protein interactions in relation to surface reactivity.
    Sund J; Alenius H; Vippola M; Savolainen K; Puustinen A
    ACS Nano; 2011 Jun; 5(6):4300-9. PubMed ID: 21528863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health impact and safety of engineered nanomaterials.
    Teow Y; Asharani PV; Hande MP; Valiyaveettil S
    Chem Commun (Camb); 2011 Jul; 47(25):7025-38. PubMed ID: 21479319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Understanding the impact of more realistic low-dose, prolonged engineered nanomaterial exposure on genotoxicity using 3D models of the human liver.
    Llewellyn SV; Conway GE; Zanoni I; Jørgensen AK; Shah UK; Seleci DA; Keller JG; Kim JW; Wohlleben W; Jensen KA; Costa A; Jenkins GJS; Clift MJD; Doak SH
    J Nanobiotechnology; 2021 Jun; 19(1):193. PubMed ID: 34183029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The neurotoxic potential of engineered nanomaterials.
    Boyes WK; Chen R; Chen C; Yokel RA
    Neurotoxicology; 2012 Aug; 33(4):902-10. PubMed ID: 22198707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.