These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23070972)

  • 1. Deciphering the molecular basis of uterine receptivity.
    Zhang S; Kong S; Lu J; Wang Q; Chen Y; Wang W; Wang B; Wang H
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2013 Jan; 80(1):8-21. PubMed ID: 23070972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molecular determinants of uterine receptivity.
    Tu Z; Ran H; Zhang S; Xia G; Wang B; Wang H
    Int J Dev Biol; 2014; 58(2-4):147-54. PubMed ID: 25023680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular cues to implantation.
    Dey SK; Lim H; Das SK; Reese J; Paria BC; Daikoku T; Wang H
    Endocr Rev; 2004 Jun; 25(3):341-73. PubMed ID: 15180948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation.
    Zhang S; Lin H; Kong S; Wang S; Wang H; Wang H; Armant DR
    Mol Aspects Med; 2013 Oct; 34(5):939-80. PubMed ID: 23290997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential expression of ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) and ERM-associated adhesion molecules in the blastocyst and uterus suggests their functions during implantation.
    Matsumoto H; Daikoku T; Wang H; Sato E; Dey SK
    Biol Reprod; 2004 Mar; 70(3):729-36. PubMed ID: 14613898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Progesterone supplementation extends uterine receptivity for blastocyst implantation in mice.
    Song H; Han K; Lim H
    Reproduction; 2007 Feb; 133(2):487-93. PubMed ID: 17307916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mouse models of implantation.
    Lee KY; Jeong JW; Tsai SY; Lydon JP; DeMayo FJ
    Trends Endocrinol Metab; 2007 Aug; 18(6):234-9. PubMed ID: 17588769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular and cellular events during blastocyst implantation in the receptive uterus: clues from mouse models.
    Matsumoto H
    J Reprod Dev; 2017 Oct; 63(5):445-454. PubMed ID: 28638003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Models for the study of uterine receptivity for blastocyst implantation.
    Sharpe-Timms KL; Glasser SR
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1999; 17(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 10406080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interferons and uterine receptivity.
    Bazer FW; Spencer TE; Johnson GA
    Semin Reprod Med; 2009 Jan; 27(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 19197808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular signaling in uterine receptivity for implantation.
    Paria BC; Lim H; Das SK; Reese J; Dey SK
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2000 Apr; 11(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 10873704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal Hoxa10 is required for pinopod formation in the development of mouse uterine receptivity to embryo implantation.
    Bagot CN; Kliman HJ; Taylor HS
    Dev Dyn; 2001 Nov; 222(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 11747087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lipid signaling in embryo implantation.
    Wang H; Dey SK
    Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat; 2005 Sep; 77(1-4):84-102. PubMed ID: 16099394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implantation: molecular basis of embryo-uterine dialogue.
    Paria BC; Song H; Dey SK
    Int J Dev Biol; 2001; 45(3):597-605. PubMed ID: 11417904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deciphering the cross-talk of implantation: advances and challenges.
    Paria BC; Reese J; Das SK; Dey SK
    Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5576):2185-8. PubMed ID: 12077405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implantation mechanisms: insights from the sheep.
    Spencer TE; Johnson GA; Bazer FW; Burghardt RC
    Reproduction; 2004 Dec; 128(6):657-68. PubMed ID: 15579583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deciphering mouse uterine receptivity for embryo implantation at single-cell resolution.
    Yang Y; Zhu QY; Liu JL
    Cell Prolif; 2021 Nov; 54(11):e13128. PubMed ID: 34558134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent molecular approaches to elucidate the mechanism of embryo implantation: trophinin, bystin, and tastin as molecules involved in the initial attachment of blastocysts to the uterus in humans.
    Aoki R; Fukuda MN
    Semin Reprod Med; 2000; 18(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 11299965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochaperone immunophilin FKBP52 is critical to uterine receptivity for embryo implantation.
    Tranguch S; Cheung-Flynn J; Daikoku T; Prapapanich V; Cox MB; Xie H; Wang H; Das SK; Smith DF; Dey SK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Oct; 102(40):14326-31. PubMed ID: 16176985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Uterine state of non-receptivity: demonstration of an ovotoxic substance (blastocidine) in rats].
    Psychoyos A; Casimiri V
    C R Seances Acad Sci D; 1980 Dec; 291(12):973-6. PubMed ID: 6784951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.