179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23071227)
1. Comparative effectiveness research paradigm: implications for systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
Brouwers MC; Thabane L; Moher D; Straus SE
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4202-7. PubMed ID: 23071227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews.
Guise JM; Viswanathan M
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 22048219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of comparative effectiveness research: a practical tool.
Schaumberg DA; McDonald L; Shah S; Stokes M; Nordstrom BL; Ramagopalan SV
J Comp Eff Res; 2018 May; 7(5):503-515. PubMed ID: 29463115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Invited article: comparative effectiveness research, evidence-based medicine, and the AAN.
French JA; England JD
Neurology; 2010 Aug; 75(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 20697109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods in comparative effectiveness research.
Armstrong K
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4208-14. PubMed ID: 23071240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A call for action: Comparative effectiveness research in asthma.
Krishnan JA; Schatz M; Apter AJ
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2011 Jan; 127(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 20855111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.
Kirpalani H; Truog WE; D'Angio CT; Cotten M
Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):341-347. PubMed ID: 27423511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effectiveness research in practice and policy for radiation oncology.
Lawrence WF
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 24314343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.
Carson SS; Goss CH; Patel SR; Anzueto A; Au DH; Elborn S; Gerald JK; Gerald LB; Kahn JM; Malhotra A; Mularski RA; Riekert KA; Rubenfeld GD; Weaver TE; Krishnan JA;
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Nov; 188(10):1253-61. PubMed ID: 24160906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Approaches to answering critical CER questions.
Kinnier CV; Chung JW; Bilimoria KY
Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():1-14. PubMed ID: 25677015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
Witt CM
J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.
Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence gaps in advanced cancer care: community-based clinicians' perspectives and priorities for CER.
Lowry SJ; Loggers ET; Bowles EJ; Wagner EH
Am J Manag Care; 2012 May; 18(5 Spec No. 2):SP77-83. PubMed ID: 22693985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative effectiveness research: opportunities in surgical oncology.
Neuman HB; Greenberg CC
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24314341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Innovative designs of point-of-care comparative effectiveness trials.
Shih MC; Turakhia M; Lai TL
Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):61-8. PubMed ID: 26099528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
