These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Guardians of precision: advancing radiation protection, safety, and quality systems in nuclear medicine. Giammarile F; Knoll P; Kunikowska J; Paez D; Estrada Lobato E; Mikhail-Lette M; Wahl R; Holmberg O; Abdel-Wahab M; Scott AM; Delgado Bolton RC Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 May; 51(6):1498-1505. PubMed ID: 38319322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Pregnancy screening strategies for potentially challenging patients before diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures: qualitative survey analysis. James DJ; Cardew P; Warren-Forward HM J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 24144517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quality assurance in renography: a review. Cosgriff PS Nucl Med Commun; 1998 Jul; 19(7):711-6. PubMed ID: 9853353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. South Thames quality standard for nuclear medicine equipment. South Thames Region Nuclear Medicine Specialty Service Committee. Marshall DS; Wells CP Nucl Med Commun; 1999 Sep; 20(9):789-98. PubMed ID: 10533183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A Practical Guide to Performance Improvement: Data Collection and Analysis. Dawson A AORN J; 2019 May; 109(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 31025352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Technical Peer Review: Methods and Outcomes. Keenan AM; Cranston T; Hill K; Stocker DJ J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Dec; 45(4):309-313. PubMed ID: 28798228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Preparation of 57Co point sources for the performance evaluation of nuclear imaging instruments. Saxena SK; Kumar M; Kumar Y; Udhayakumar J; Pandey U; Dash A Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Sep; 79():12-7. PubMed ID: 23722070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Quality assurance of nuclear medicine instrumentation. Paras P Ric Clin Lab; 1981; 11(4):357-77. PubMed ID: 7323614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Nuclear medicine: what kind of quality would we want if we were the patient? Lucignani G; Del Sole A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Nov; 37(11):2194-8. PubMed ID: 20838996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Ancillary equipment to increase quality and reduce radiation exposure in the equine nuclear medicine laboratory. Neuwirth L; Romine C Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2000; 41(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 11052373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessing nuclear medicine practices: a critical evaluation of QUANUM through a quality improvement perspective and its wider relevance. Vinjamuri S; Pant V; Bomanji JB; Marengo M; Zanial A; Dondi M; Paez D Nucl Med Commun; 2024 Apr; 45(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 38247573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A Practical Guide to Performance Improvement: Change Acceleration Process and Techniques to Maintain Improvements. Dawson A AORN J; 2020 Jan; 111(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 31886543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Possibilities of software phantoms for quality control of KBS in nuclear medicine. Kotzke K; Pretschner DP Methods Inf Med; 1992 Jun; 31(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 1635464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. New radio-tracers and methods of quality assurance for nuclear medicine applications. Villigen, Switzerland, 6-7 October 1994. Proceedings. Nucl Med Biol; 1995 Nov; 22(8):957-1079. PubMed ID: 8998471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Routine quality control recommendations for nuclear medicine instrumentation. ; Busemann Sokole E; Płachcínska A; Britten A; ; Lyra Georgosopoulou M; Tindale W; Klett R Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Mar; 37(3):662-71. PubMed ID: 20130859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]